
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点,否则你将被曝光
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danger strong hits: 12 | 高风险路径:Webshell、RCE、漏洞利用 | +100 | |
| Danger medium hits: 6 | 中等风险:管理面板、配置文件 | +60 | |
| 404 ratio 40-60% | 大多数请求返回404——目录枚举 | +15 | |
| Foreign referer seen | 来自无关外部域名的Referer | +10 |
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑,目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
IP 91.199.3.55正在枚举目录。在10次以上404错误后配置fail2ban apache-404 jail。禁用目录列表。
来自同一/24子网的其他被封锁IP——表明该网络范围存在系统性滥用。
来自Shodan的网络侦察数据。开放端口可能表示正在运行的服务、错误配置或潜在的攻击面。
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3389 | RDP | High | Remote Desktop Protocol — primary target for ransomware attacks |
| 5432 | PostgreSQL | High | PostgreSQL database — direct database access risk |
| 5433 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 5433 |
| 6000 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6000 |
| 6002 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6002 |
| 6010 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6010 |
| 6348 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6348 |
| 6352 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6352 |
| 6363 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6363 |
| 6379 | Redis | Critical | Redis in-memory database — frequently misconfigured without auth |
| 6400 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6400 |
| 6432 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6432 |
| 6443 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6443 |
| 6887 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6887 |
| 6955 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6955 |
| 7001 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7001 |
| 7003 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7003 |
| 7004 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7004 |
| 7006 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7006 |
| 7007 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7007 |
| 7012 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7012 |
| 7015 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7015 |
| 7018 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7018 |
| 7020 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7020 |
| 7022 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7022 |
| 7025 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7025 |
| 7057 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7057 |
| 7070 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7070 |
| 7071 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7071 |
| 7079 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7079 |
| 7080 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7080 |
| 7081 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7081 |
| 7084 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7084 |
| 7085 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7085 |
| 7086 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7086 |
| 7087 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7087 |
| 7088 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7088 |
| 7090 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7090 |
| 7100 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7100 |
| 7102 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7102 |
| 7105 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7105 |
| 7171 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7171 |
| 7172 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7172 |
| 7173 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7173 |
| 7218 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7218 |
| 8502 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8502 |
| 9001 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 9001 |
⚠️ 在91.199.3.55上检测到3个高风险端口。暴露的RDP (3389)是勒索软件攻击的首要入口。 开放的数据库端口表明可能存在数据泄露风险。 这些服务在没有严格防火墙规则的情况下不应公开访问。
数据来源:Shodan InternetDB。独立于abuse.mom进行扫描。
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查:Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
91.199.3.55 has been assigned a threat score of 185/100 (Critical). 这代表着极高风险等级。我们的检测系统已从该地址标记出多个高置信度的恶意意图指标。
The following attack categories were identified:
IP地址91.199.3.55已追溯至Bell, United States,运营在PureVoltage Hosting Inc.的网络中。我们的威胁检测系统根据观察到的恶意行为模式标记了此地址。 在其1天的观察窗口期间,我们记录了来自此IP的1次敌对请求——平均每天约1次。 被归类为托管IP,此地址可能运行在租用的服务器或云实例上。攻击者偏好数据中心IP因其高带宽和一次性特点。 该IP表现出目录枚举行为,系统地请求不存在的路径以发现隐藏文件和配置错误的资源。 United States目前在我们的数据库中占198个被封锁IP,使其成为恶意流量的重要来源。 威胁评分185/100,此IP属于我们数据库中最危险的地址之一。强烈建议立即完全封锁。
This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.
Path traversal attacks attempt to access files outside the intended directory by manipulating file path references. Attackers use sequences like ../ to reach sensitive system files such as /etc/passwd or application configuration files.
Modern deception technology deploys fake credentials, decoy files, and breadcrumbs throughout production environments. When attackers interact with these deceptions, high-fidelity alerts trigger with virtually zero false positives.