
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点,否则你将被曝光
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danger medium hits: 4 | 中等风险:管理面板、配置文件 | +40 | |
| Probe pattern 302->404 same path | 自动分析检测到行为异常 | +20 | |
| Foreign referer seen | 来自无关外部域名的Referer | +10 | |
| Imported from old blocklist | 自动分析检测到行为异常 | +0 | |
| Danger medium hits: 10 | 中等风险:管理面板、配置文件 | +60 | |
| 404 ratio 40-60% | 大多数请求返回404——目录枚举 | +15 |
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑,目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
IP 91.199.3.45正在枚举目录。在10次以上404错误后配置fail2ban apache-404 jail。禁用目录列表。
来自同一/24子网的其他被封锁IP——表明该网络范围存在系统性滥用。
来自Shodan的网络侦察数据。开放端口可能表示正在运行的服务、错误配置或潜在的攻击面。
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3389 | RDP | High | Remote Desktop Protocol — primary target for ransomware attacks |
| 5432 | PostgreSQL | High | PostgreSQL database — direct database access risk |
| 5433 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 5433 |
| 6000 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6000 |
| 6002 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6002 |
| 6007 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6007 |
| 6348 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6348 |
| 6379 | Redis | Critical | Redis in-memory database — frequently misconfigured without auth |
| 6380 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6380 |
| 6400 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6400 |
| 6405 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6405 |
| 6432 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6432 |
| 6433 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6433 |
| 6440 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6440 |
| 6443 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6443 |
| 6887 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6887 |
| 6955 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6955 |
| 7000 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7000 |
| 7001 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7001 |
| 7002 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7002 |
| 7003 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7003 |
| 7006 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7006 |
| 7010 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7010 |
| 7011 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7011 |
| 7013 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7013 |
| 7014 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7014 |
| 7015 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7015 |
| 7016 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7016 |
| 7018 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7018 |
| 7020 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7020 |
| 7021 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7021 |
| 7022 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7022 |
| 7025 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7025 |
| 7057 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7057 |
| 7070 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7070 |
| 7071 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7071 |
| 7081 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7081 |
| 7082 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7082 |
| 7083 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7083 |
| 7085 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7085 |
| 7086 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7086 |
| 7087 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7087 |
| 7090 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7090 |
| 7100 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7100 |
| 7102 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7102 |
| 7105 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7105 |
| 7170 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7170 |
| 7171 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7171 |
| 7172 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7172 |
| 7173 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7173 |
| 7218 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7218 |
| 8502 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8502 |
| 9001 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 9001 |
⚠️ 在91.199.3.45上检测到3个高风险端口。暴露的RDP (3389)是勒索软件攻击的首要入口。 开放的数据库端口表明可能存在数据泄露风险。 这些服务在没有严格防火墙规则的情况下不应公开访问。
数据来源:Shodan InternetDB。独立于abuse.mom进行扫描。
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查:Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
91.199.3.45 has been assigned a threat score of 105/100 (Critical). 凭借此评分,该IP属于严重威胁级别——是我们监控数据库中最危险的地址之一。
The following attack categories were identified:
IP地址91.199.3.45已追溯至Bell, United States,运营在PureVoltage Hosting Inc.的网络中。我们的威胁检测系统根据观察到的恶意行为模式标记了此地址。 在其26天的观察窗口期间,我们记录了来自此IP的8次敌对请求——平均每天约0.3次。 此地址属于数据中心或云托管提供商。托管IP经常被专门租用廉价VPS实例来进行攻击的威胁行为者利用。 该IP表现出目录枚举行为,系统地请求不存在的路径以发现隐藏文件和配置错误的资源。 United States目前在我们的数据库中占198个被封锁IP,使其成为恶意流量的重要来源。 评分105/100将此地址置于最高严重性级别。应封锁并调查任何历史连接。
This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.
Command injection occurs when attackers insert operating system commands through application inputs. Successful exploitation grants direct server access, enabling data theft, malware installation, and lateral movement across networks.
DNS sinkholing redirects queries for known malicious domains to controlled IP addresses. This technique blocks malware communication, prevents data exfiltration, and identifies compromised internal hosts attempting to contact command-and-control servers.