IP威胁报告
58.216.109.18
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点，否则你将被曝光
地理位置与分类
检测签名
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danger medium hits: 6 | 中等风险：管理面板、配置文件 | +60 | |
| Foreign referer seen | 来自无关外部域名的Referer | +10 |
观察到的活动
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑，目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
时间线
网络供应商
建议
已采取和建议的措施
- IP 58.216.109.18 已在应用层封锁（HTTP 403）
- 建议在防火墙层（iptables/CSF）进行封锁
- 在同一/24子网中检测到其他恶意IP——建议封锁 58.216.109.0/24
- 通过abuse联系方式向网络供应商举报
- 确保敏感文件（.env、.git、备份）无法从网络访问
⚙️ 一般安全
将58.216.109.18添加到防火墙封锁列表。检查日志中的成功连接。在所有面向公众的服务上启用全面日志记录。
邻居在 58.216.109.0/24
来自同一/24子网的其他被封锁IP——表明该网络范围存在系统性滥用。
开放端口和服务
来自Shodan的网络侦察数据。开放端口可能表示正在运行的服务、错误配置或潜在的攻击面。
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 80 | HTTP | Low | HTTP web server — standard web traffic |
| 161 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 161 |
| 902 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 902 |
| 8001 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8001 |
| 8005 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8005 |
| 8069 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8069 |
| 8080 | HTTP-Alt | Low | HTTP alternative port — often used for admin panels or proxies |
| 8081 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8081 |
| 8089 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8089 |
| 8099 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8099 |
| 8443 | HTTPS-Alt | Low | Service on port 8443 |
| 9101 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 9101 |
数据来源：Shodan InternetDB。独立于abuse.mom进行扫描。
黑名单状态 (DNSBL)
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查：Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
Threat Analysis
58.216.109.18 has been assigned a threat score of 70/100 (High). 在此威胁级别下，该IP被视为高风险。应更新防火墙规则以拒绝来自此来源的流量。
📊 Threat Analysis
我们的监控基础设施已将58.216.109.18（地理位置为Nanjing, China，运营在China Telecom的网络中）识别为可疑网络活动的来源。 我们的传感器在1天内捕获了来自此地址的1次恶意请求，反映出每天约1次的持续攻击节奏。 这是一个住宅IP地址，表明可能是被入侵的家用设备，如路由器、智能设备或参与僵尸网络的受感染工作站。 China目前在我们的数据库中占105个被封锁IP，使其成为恶意流量的重要来源。 评分70/100表明这是一个已确认的恶意行为者。网络级别封锁是适当的。
This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.
Related Threats
🇨🇳 Top threats from China
180.184.55.222 (340)117.50.120.215 (235)115.191.1.205 (235)123.58.16.244 (235)43.142.47.248 (230)View all →🏢 Same network: AS140293
218.93.165.108 (80)58.216.109.17 (70)58.216.109.13 (70)58.216.109.8 (70)View all →Security Intelligence
💡 Brute Force Attack Mechanics
Brute force attacks systematically try username and password combinations to gain unauthorized access. Modern attacks leverage credential databases from previous breaches, testing millions of combinations using distributed botnets across multiple IP addresses.
💡 SSH Brute Force Defense
SSH servers face constant brute force attacks targeting common usernames and weak passwords. Key-based authentication, fail2ban, non-standard ports, and IP allowlisting dramatically reduce the attack surface. Monitoring auth logs reveals active campaigns and compromised credentials.