IP威胁报告
58.216.109.13
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点，否则你将被曝光
地理位置与分类
检测签名
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danger medium hits: 8 | 中等风险：管理面板、配置文件 | +60 | |
| Foreign referer seen | 来自无关外部域名的Referer | +10 | |
| Danger medium hits: 3 | 中等风险：管理面板、配置文件 | +30 |
观察到的活动
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑，目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
时间线
网络供应商
建议
已采取和建议的措施
- IP 58.216.109.13 已在应用层封锁（HTTP 403）
- 建议在防火墙层（iptables/CSF）进行封锁
- 在同一/24子网中检测到其他恶意IP——建议封锁 58.216.109.0/24
- 通过abuse联系方式向网络供应商举报
- 确保敏感文件（.env、.git、备份）无法从网络访问
⚙️ 一般安全
将58.216.109.13添加到防火墙封锁列表。检查日志中的成功连接。在所有面向公众的服务上启用全面日志记录。
邻居在 58.216.109.0/24
来自同一/24子网的其他被封锁IP——表明该网络范围存在系统性滥用。
开放端口和服务
来自Shodan的网络侦察数据。开放端口可能表示正在运行的服务、错误配置或潜在的攻击面。
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 80 | HTTP | Low | HTTP web server — standard web traffic |
| 843 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 843 |
| 999 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 999 |
| 8001 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8001 |
| 8002 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8002 |
| 8068 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8068 |
| 8069 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8069 |
| 8080 | HTTP-Alt | Low | HTTP alternative port — often used for admin panels or proxies |
| 8081 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8081 |
| 8089 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8089 |
| 8099 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8099 |
| 8443 | HTTPS-Alt | Low | Service on port 8443 |
| 9101 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 9101 |
数据来源：Shodan InternetDB。独立于abuse.mom进行扫描。
黑名单状态 (DNSBL)
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查：Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
Threat Analysis
58.216.109.13 has been assigned a threat score of 70/100 (High). 该IP被评为高级别威胁。网络管理员应实施阻止规则并监控来自此地址的任何连接。
📊 Threat Analysis
IP地址58.216.109.13已追溯至Nanjing, China，运营在China Telecom的网络中。我们的威胁检测系统根据观察到的恶意行为模式标记了此地址。 在8天的时间内，此IP产生了3次恶意请求，平均每天约0.4次请求。 从住宅网络运营，此IP可能代表一个被入侵的家庭网关或已被招募到更大攻击基础设施中的IoT设备。 我们的记录显示来自China的105个恶意IP，使其成为全球威胁活动的重要贡献者。 评分70/100表明这是一个已确认的恶意行为者。网络级别封锁是适当的。
This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.
Related Threats
🇨🇳 Top threats from China
180.184.55.222 (340)117.50.120.215 (235)115.191.1.205 (235)123.58.16.244 (235)43.142.47.248 (230)View all →🏢 Same network: AS140293
218.93.165.108 (80)58.216.109.17 (70)58.216.109.8 (70)58.216.109.18 (70)View all →Security Intelligence
💡 WordPress-Specific Attack Vectors
WordPress sites face constant automated attacks targeting xmlrpc.php for brute force amplification, wp-login.php for credential theft, and vulnerable plugins for remote code execution. Over 90% of CMS-based attacks specifically target WordPress installations.
💡 Memory Safety and Buffer Overflows
Buffer overflow vulnerabilities remain relevant in C/C++ applications despite decades of mitigation efforts. Modern protections like ASLR, stack canaries, and DEP reduce exploitability but determined attackers continue finding bypass techniques.