
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点,否则你将被曝光
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danger strong hits: 5 | 高风险路径:Webshell、RCE、漏洞利用 | +100 | |
| Danger medium hits: 3 | 中等风险:管理面板、配置文件 | +30 | |
| Burst: 8 req / 2s | 请求频率异常——自动扫描 | +35 | |
| Foreign referer seen | 来自无关外部域名的Referer | +10 |
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑,目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
在nginx中实施limit_req_zone。部署具有DDoS防护的CDN。配置SYN cookies和连接跟踪以限制158.173.21.30。
来自同一/24子网的其他被封锁IP——表明该网络范围存在系统性滥用。
来自Shodan的网络侦察数据。开放端口可能表示正在运行的服务、错误配置或潜在的攻击面。
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 80 | HTTP | Low | HTTP web server — standard web traffic |
| 443 | HTTPS | Low | HTTPS web server — encrypted web traffic |
| 502 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 502 |
| 1337 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1337 |
| 8443 | HTTPS-Alt | Low | Service on port 8443 |
数据来源:Shodan InternetDB。独立于abuse.mom进行扫描。
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查:Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
158.173.21.30 has been assigned a threat score of 175/100 (Critical). 这将其归入严重威胁类别。强烈建议在所有网络边界立即进行封锁。
The following attack categories were identified:
地址158.173.21.30来源于Amsterdam, Netherlands,运营在Datacamp Limited的网络中。它是通过对受监控端点的入站网络流量进行自动分析而被识别的。 在其1天的观察窗口期间,我们记录了来自此IP的1次敌对请求——平均每天约1次。 该地址作为VPN/代理出口节点运营。攻击者通过匿名化服务路由流量以隐藏真实位置。 来自此IP的基于速率的攻击旨在通过大量请求洪水压垮服务器资源。 我们的记录显示来自Netherlands的118个恶意IP,使其成为全球威胁活动的重要贡献者。 评分175/100将此地址置于最高严重性级别。应封锁并调查任何历史连接。
This IP is associated with a VPN or proxy service. Attackers frequently route their traffic through anonymizing services to obscure their true location. This makes attribution more challenging but the malicious behavior patterns remain detectable.
RCE vulnerabilities allow attackers to execute arbitrary code on target servers. These critical flaws often arise from deserialization bugs, template injection, or file upload vulnerabilities, and represent the highest severity class of web application weaknesses.
VPN exit nodes aggregate traffic from many users, creating mixed reputation profiles. While legitimate users seek privacy, attackers exploit VPN services to anonymize malicious activity, making IP-based blocking of VPN nodes a complex policy decision.