
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点,否则你将被曝光
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danger medium hits: 6 | 中等风险:管理面板、配置文件 | +60 | |
| 404 ratio 40-60% | 大多数请求返回404——目录枚举 | +15 | |
| Foreign referer seen | 来自无关外部域名的Referer | +10 | |
| Danger medium hits: 5 | 中等风险:管理面板、配置文件 | +50 | |
| Danger medium hits: 3 | 中等风险:管理面板、配置文件 | +30 |
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑,目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
IP 158.173.21.132正在枚举目录。在10次以上404错误后配置fail2ban apache-404 jail。禁用目录列表。
来自同一/24子网的其他被封锁IP——表明该网络范围存在系统性滥用。
来自Shodan的网络侦察数据。开放端口可能表示正在运行的服务、错误配置或潜在的攻击面。
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 80 | HTTP | Low | HTTP web server — standard web traffic |
| 443 | HTTPS | Low | HTTPS web server — encrypted web traffic |
| 1337 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1337 |
| 8443 | HTTPS-Alt | Low | Service on port 8443 |
数据来源:Shodan InternetDB。独立于abuse.mom进行扫描。
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查:Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
158.173.21.132 has been assigned a threat score of 85/100 (Critical). 如此高的分数标志着一个关键威胁行为者。该地址在多个检测向量上表现出持续的、激进的恶意行为。
The following attack categories were identified:
158.173.21.132注册在Amsterdam, Netherlands,运营在Datacamp Limited的网络中。该IP在触发多个行为检测签名后首次出现在我们的威胁源中。 我们的传感器在1天内捕获了来自此地址的3次恶意请求,反映出每天约3次的持续攻击节奏。 此IP被识别为VPN或代理端点,通常用于掩盖攻击流量的真实来源并绕过地理或信誉封锁。 该IP表现出目录枚举行为,系统地请求不存在的路径以发现隐藏文件和配置错误的资源。 Netherlands目前在我们的数据库中占118个被封锁IP,使其成为恶意流量的重要来源。 威胁评分85/100将此IP置于高风险类别。建议在防火墙级别进行封锁。
This IP is associated with a VPN or proxy service. Attackers frequently route their traffic through anonymizing services to obscure their true location. This makes attribution more challenging but the malicious behavior patterns remain detectable.
RCE vulnerabilities allow attackers to execute arbitrary code on target servers. These critical flaws often arise from deserialization bugs, template injection, or file upload vulnerabilities, and represent the highest severity class of web application weaknesses.
Border Gateway Protocol hijacking allows attackers to redirect internet traffic through their infrastructure. While less common than application-level attacks, BGP hijacks can intercept sensitive data, inject malware, or cause widespread service disruption.