ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
91.230.225.140

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-07-12 08:11:44
First seen: 2026-07-11 18:45:48
Last seen: 2026-07-12 00:27:29
95

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 95/100. Total malicious requests observed: 10.

BOT_UADANGER_PATH
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
91.230.225.140
Type
VPN
Country
🇬🇧 United Kingdom
City
London
ISP
F.N.S. HOLDINGS LIMITED
Organization
Netrouting B.V
Autonomous System
AS206092 F.N.S. HOLDINGS LIMITED
Hit Count
10
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger medium hits: 3Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+30
Danger strong hits: 1High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+25
UA bot: Go-http-clientKnown bot/crawler User-Agent detected+40
Σ = 95
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-07-11 18:45:48
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger medium hits: 3 (+30), Danger strong hits: 1 (+25), UA bot: Go-http-client (+40)
2026-07-12 00:27:29
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 95/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

F.N.S. HOLDINGS LIMITED
AS206092 · 🇬🇧 United Kingdom
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 91.230.225.140 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 91.230.225.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 91.230.225.140 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

07

Neighbors in 91.230.225.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

91.230.225.140 has been assigned a threat score of 95/100 (Critical). This represents a critical risk level. Our detection systems have flagged multiple high-confidence indicators of malicious intent from this address.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

Threat intelligence analysis has linked 91.230.225.140 to malicious activity originating from London, United Kingdom, operating on the network of F.N.S. HOLDINGS LIMITED. The address has been under observation since its initial detection. Over a period of 1 days, this IP generated 10 malicious requests, averaging approximately 10 requests per day. This IP is identified as a VPN or proxy endpoint, commonly used to mask the true origin of attack traffic and bypass geographic or reputation-based blocking. Detected suspicious User-Agent anomalies including empty, forged, or rapidly rotating UA strings — characteristic of automated scanning tools. With 142 flagged addresses, United Kingdom represents a significant presence in our threat database. With a threat score of 95/100, this IP is among the most dangerous addresses in our database. Immediate and complete blocking is strongly recommended.

This IP is associated with a VPN or proxy service. Attackers frequently route their traffic through anonymizing services to obscure their true location. This makes attribution more challenging but the malicious behavior patterns remain detectable.

11

Related Threats

🇬🇧 Top threats from United Kingdom

104.28.240.60 (340)104.28.208.60 (340)91.230.225.239 (305)91.230.225.147 (305)185.92.25.78 (305)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS206092

2.57.170.183 (305)2.57.170.88 (305)185.192.16.103 (295)185.192.71.157 (295)2.57.170.1 (295)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

SSRF attacks trick servers into making requests to internal resources that should not be publicly accessible. This can expose cloud metadata endpoints, internal APIs, and private network services, potentially leading to full infrastructure compromise.

💡 SSH Brute Force Defense

SSH servers face constant brute force attacks targeting common usernames and weak passwords. Key-based authentication, fail2ban, non-standard ports, and IP allowlisting dramatically reduce the attack surface. Monitoring auth logs reveals active campaigns and compromised credentials.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: