ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
82.80.249.221

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-22 05:35:45
First seen: 2026-04-30 11:00:06
Last seen: 2026-04-30 11:00:06
60

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 60/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

UA_CHANGEDBURST
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
82.80.249.221
Type
Hosting
Country
🇮🇱 IL
City
Netanya
ISP
Bezeq International Ltd.
Organization
Bezeqint Hosting
Autonomous System
AS8551 Bezeq International Ltd.
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
UA changed for same IPMultiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique+25
Burst: 5 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Σ = 60
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-04-30 11:00:06
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
UA changed for same IP (+25), Burst: 5 req / 2s (+35)
2026-04-30 11:00:06
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 60/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Bezeq International Ltd.
AS8551 · 🇮🇱 IL
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 82.80.249.221 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 82.80.249.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 82.80.249.221 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

🌊 Traffic Flood Defense

IP 82.80.249.221 is generating excessive traffic. Limit connections per source IP. Enable geographic blocking if traffic from this region is unexpected.

07

Neighbors in 82.80.249.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

82.80.249.221 has been assigned a threat score of 60/100 (High). The IP is rated as a high-level threat. Network administrators should implement blocking rules and monitor for any connections from this address.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent AnomalyRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

82.80.249.221 is registered in Netanya, IL, operating on the network of Bezeq International Ltd.. This IP first appeared in our threat feeds after triggering multiple behavioral detection signatures. Our sensors captured 1 malicious requests from this address across a 1-day span, reflecting a sustained attack cadence of ~1 requests per day. Classified as a hosting IP, this address likely runs on a rented server or cloud instance. Attackers prefer datacenter IPs for their high bandwidth and disposable nature. The dual attack vectors of User-Agent Anomaly combined with Request Flooding indicate a coordinated assault rather than opportunistic scanning. IL currently accounts for 102 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. At 60/100, this IP presents a meaningful threat. Implement rate limiting with escalation to blocking.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇮🇱 Top threats from IL

203.159.81.66 (255)203.159.81.57 (255)203.159.81.77 (255)203.159.81.93 (255)203.159.81.81 (255)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS8551

82.80.249.137 (105)82.80.249.138 (60)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 TLS Fingerprinting (JA3/JA4)

TLS fingerprinting creates unique identifiers based on how clients negotiate encrypted connections. The JA3 and JA4 methods generate hashes from TLS ClientHello parameters, enabling identification of specific tools and malware regardless of IP address changes.

💡 WordPress-Specific Attack Vectors

WordPress sites face constant automated attacks targeting xmlrpc.php for brute force amplification, wp-login.php for credential theft, and vulnerable plugins for remote code execution. Over 90% of CMS-based attacks specifically target WordPress installations.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: