ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
63.135.161.175

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-07-12 08:11:54
First seen: 2026-07-08 23:21:18
Last seen: 2026-07-12 00:58:02
85

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 85/100. Total malicious requests observed: 139.

DANGER_PATHUA_CHANGED
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
63.135.161.175
Type
VPN
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
New York
ISP
F.N.S. HOLDINGS LIMITED
Organization
F.N.S. HOLDINGS LIMITED
Autonomous System
AS206092 F.N.S. HOLDINGS LIMITED
Hit Count
139
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger medium hits: 1Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+10
Danger strong hits: 2High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+50
UA changedMultiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique+25
Σ = 85
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-07-08 23:21:18
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger medium hits: 1 (+10), Danger strong hits: 2 (+50), UA changed (+25)
2026-07-12 00:58:02
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 85/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

F.N.S. HOLDINGS LIMITED
AS206092 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 63.135.161.175 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 63.135.161.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 Bot Detection

Address UA spoofing from 63.135.161.175: maintain blocklist of known malicious UA strings, require consistent UA across sessions, implement TLS fingerprinting.

07

Neighbors in 63.135.161.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

63.135.161.175 has been assigned a threat score of 85/100 (Critical). This places it in the critical threat category. Immediate blocking is strongly advised across all network perimeters.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

IP address 63.135.161.175 has been traced to New York, United States, operating on the network of F.N.S. HOLDINGS LIMITED. Our threat detection systems have flagged this address based on observed malicious behavior patterns. During its 3-day observation window, we recorded 139 hostile requests from this IP — roughly 46.3 per day on average. This IP is identified as a VPN or proxy endpoint, commonly used to mask the true origin of attack traffic and bypass geographic or reputation-based blocking. The IP exhibits User-Agent manipulation, switching between different browser identities or sending empty headers. With 205 flagged addresses, United States represents a significant presence in our threat database. A threat score of 85/100 places this IP in the high-risk category. Blocking at the firewall level is recommended.

This IP is associated with a VPN or proxy service. Attackers frequently route their traffic through anonymizing services to obscure their true location. This makes attribution more challenging but the malicious behavior patterns remain detectable.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

104.28.246.115 (350)104.28.214.122 (350)103.215.74.213 (340)103.168.66.237 (340)34.187.158.4 (340)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS206092

2.57.170.183 (305)2.57.170.88 (305)185.192.16.103 (295)185.192.71.157 (295)2.57.170.1 (295)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 Remote Code Execution (RCE)

RCE vulnerabilities allow attackers to execute arbitrary code on target servers. These critical flaws often arise from deserialization bugs, template injection, or file upload vulnerabilities, and represent the highest severity class of web application weaknesses.

💡 Email Authentication: SPF, DKIM, DMARC

Email authentication protocols work together to prevent spoofing. SPF validates sending servers, DKIM provides cryptographic message signing, and DMARC defines enforcement policies. Full implementation significantly reduces phishing effectiveness.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: