ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
45.90.32.134

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-27 14:05:49
First seen: 2026-04-04 10:00:07
Last seen: 2026-04-04 10:00:07
70

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 70/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

DANGER_PATHREDIRECT_PROBEREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
45.90.32.134
Type
Hosting
Country
🇷🇺 Russia
City
St Petersburg
ISP
Beget LLC
Organization
Beget
Autonomous System
AS198610 Beget LLC
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger medium hits: 4Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+40
Probe pattern 302->404 same pathBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 70
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-04-04 10:00:07
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger medium hits: 4 (+40), Probe pattern 302->404 same path (+20), Foreign referer seen (+10)
2026-04-04 10:00:07
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 70/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Beget LLC
AS198610 · 🇷🇺 Russia
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 45.90.32.134 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 45.90.32.134: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (6)
PortServiceRiskDescription
22SSHLowSecure Shell — common brute force target for remote access
3000UnknownLowService on port 3000
5001UnknownLowService on port 5001
8222UnknownLowService on port 8222
8888HTTP-AltLowService on port 8888
27017MongoDBCriticalMongoDB — commonly found exposed without authentication

⚠️ Network scanning reveals 1 dangerous service exposed on 45.90.32.134. Open database ports suggest possible data exfiltration risk. These services should not be publicly accessible without strict firewall rules.

KNOWN VULNERABILITIES (CVE) (34)
CVE IDLink
CVE-2025-69419NVD →
CVE-2026-25609NVD →
CVE-2009-3765NVD →
CVE-2009-3766NVD →
CVE-2025-10060NVD →
CVE-2026-1849NVD →
CVE-2025-69418NVD →
CVE-2026-1850NVD →
CVE-2026-25610NVD →
CVE-2026-22796NVD →
CVE-2026-1847NVD →
CVE-2025-14847NVD →
CVE-2026-1848NVD →
CVE-2025-15467NVD →
CVE-2025-12893NVD →
CVE-2025-13644NVD →
CVE-2019-0190NVD →
CVE-2025-69420NVD →
CVE-2025-10061NVD →
CVE-2025-6712NVD →
CVE-2025-12657NVD →
CVE-2026-25613NVD →
CVE-2025-11979NVD →
CVE-2025-68160NVD →
CVE-2025-69421NVD →
+9 more

🔴 Security scanning identified 34 vulnerability entries on this host. This volume strongly suggests severely outdated software. Consult NVD advisories for details.

DETECTED TECHNOLOGIES
canonical:ubuntu_linuxopenssl:openssl:3.0.13openbsd:openssh:8.9p1mongodb:mongodb:8.0.8

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

45.90.32.134 has been assigned a threat score of 70/100 (High). The IP is rated as a high-level threat. Network administrators should implement blocking rules and monitor for any connections from this address.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path Enumeration

📊 Threat Analysis

Threat intelligence analysis has linked 45.90.32.134 to malicious activity originating from St Petersburg, Russia, operating on the network of Beget LLC. The address has been under observation since its initial detection. Our sensors captured 1 malicious requests from this address across a 1-day span, reflecting a sustained attack cadence of ~1 requests per day. Classified as a hosting IP, this address likely runs on a rented server or cloud instance. Attackers prefer datacenter IPs for their high bandwidth and disposable nature. The IP exhibits directory enumeration behavior, systematically requesting non-existent paths to discover hidden files and misconfigured resources. Our records show 120 malicious IPs originating from Russia, positioning it as a significant contributor to global threat activity. The score of 70/100 indicates a confirmed malicious actor. Network-level blocking is appropriate.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇷🇺 Top threats from Russia

157.22.102.172 (313)178.130.54.159 (288)72.56.191.6 (265)95.182.125.201 (265)91.240.87.225 (263)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS198610

5.101.156.173 (150)5.101.157.234 (150)5.101.157.136 (150)185.225.33.12 (150)5.101.156.133 (150)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 SQL Injection Campaigns

SQL injection remains one of the most common web attack vectors. Attackers inject malicious SQL code through input fields to extract database contents, modify data, or gain administrative access. Automated scanners test for SQLi vulnerabilities at massive scale.

💡 Responsible Disclosure Ethics

Responsible disclosure balances public safety with giving vendors time to patch vulnerabilities. The security community generally supports coordinated disclosure timelines, but disagreements about appropriate timeframes and full disclosure continue to drive policy debates.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: