IP Threat Report
3.106.134.144
ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED
Geolocation & Classification
Detection Signatures
| Signature | Description | Points | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 404 ratio 40-60% | Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration | +15 | |
| Burst 10/2s | Abnormally fast request rate — automated scanning | +35 | |
| Burst 30/10s | Abnormally fast request rate — automated scanning | +35 | |
| Burst 31/10s | Abnormally fast request rate — automated scanning | +35 | |
| Burst 32/10s | Abnormally fast request rate — automated scanning | +35 | |
| Burst 33/10s | Abnormally fast request rate — automated scanning | +35 | |
| Burst 34/10s | Abnormally fast request rate — automated scanning | +35 | |
| Burst 35/10s | Abnormally fast request rate — automated scanning | +35 | |
| Burst 36/10s | Abnormally fast request rate — automated scanning | +35 | |
| Burst 37/10s | Abnormally fast request rate — automated scanning | +35 | |
| Burst 5/2s | Abnormally fast request rate — automated scanning | +35 | |
| Burst 9/2s | Abnormally fast request rate — automated scanning | +35 | |
| Danger strong hits: 106 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Danger strong hits: 110 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Danger strong hits: 116 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Danger strong hits: 131 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Danger strong hits: 166 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Danger strong hits: 173 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Danger strong hits: 202 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Danger strong hits: 205 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Danger strong hits: 279 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Danger strong hits: 315 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Danger strong hits: 330 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Danger strong hits: 337 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Danger strong hits: 361 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Danger strong hits: 396 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Danger strong hits: 4 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Danger strong hits: 400 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Danger strong hits: 402 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Danger strong hits: 415 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Danger strong hits: 48 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Danger strong hits: 70 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Danger strong hits: 72 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Danger strong hits: 79 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| POST seen | Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis | +8 |
Observed Activity
Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
Timeline
Network Provider
Recommendations
Actions taken & recommended
- IP 3.106.134.144 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
- Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
- Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
- Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web
🔎 Directory Scan Defense
IP 3.106.134.144 is enumerating directories. Configure fail2ban apache-404 jail after 10+ 404 errors. Disable directory listings. Normalize all 404 responses.
🌊 Traffic Flood Defense
IP 3.106.134.144 is generating excessive traffic. Limit connections per source IP. Enable geographic blocking if traffic from this region is unexpected.
Blacklist Status (DNSBL)
This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.
Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.
Threat Analysis
3.106.134.144 has been assigned a threat score of 193/100 (Critical). With this rating, the IP falls into the critical severity bracket — among the most dangerous addresses in our monitoring database.
The following attack categories were identified:
📊 Threat Analysis
Network traffic from 3.106.134.144, located in Sydney, Australia, operating on the network of Amazon Technologies Inc., has been classified as malicious by our automated threat scoring engine. During its 5-day observation window, we recorded 8,395 hostile requests from this IP — roughly 1679 per day on average. Classified as a hosting IP, this address likely runs on a rented server or cloud instance. Attackers prefer datacenter IPs for their high bandwidth and disposable nature. The dual attack vectors of Path Enumeration combined with Request Flooding indicate a coordinated assault rather than opportunistic scanning. Australia currently accounts for 101 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. At 193/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.
This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.
Related Threats
Security Intelligence
💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches
Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.
💡 VPN Exit Node Reputation
VPN exit nodes aggregate traffic from many users, creating mixed reputation profiles. While legitimate users seek privacy, attackers exploit VPN services to anonymize malicious activity, making IP-based blocking of VPN nodes a complex policy decision.