ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
20.42.209.0

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-30 07:14:42
First seen: 2026-02-17 17:25:05
Last seen: 2026-02-20 16:55:04
280

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 280/100. Total malicious requests observed: 40.

UA_SUSDANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEBURSTIMPORT
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
20.42.209.0
Type
Hosting
Country
🇦🇺 Australia
City
The Rocks
ISP
Microsoft Corporation
Organization
Microsoft Azure Cloud (australiaeast)
Autonomous System
AS8075 Microsoft Corporation
Hit Count
40
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
UA suspicious (short/empty)Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+15
Danger strong hits: 2High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+50
Danger medium hits: 120Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Probe pattern 302->404 same pathBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Burst: 11 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 37 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger medium hits: 138Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 39 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 56High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 303Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 4High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 210Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 38 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 1High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+25
Danger medium hits: 70Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
404 ratio >= 60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+25
Danger strong hits: 3High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+75
Danger medium hits: 140Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 42High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 204Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 202Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 201Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Imported from old blocklistBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+0
Danger strong hits: 6High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 130Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 27High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 134Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 30High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 213Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 20High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 24High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 199Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 12Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 18 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger medium hits: 211Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 40 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger medium hits: 110Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 206Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 165Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 9High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 113Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 7High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 93Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 24Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 35 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger medium hits: 46Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 18High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 167Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 159Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 106Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 251Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Σ = 3130
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-02-17 17:25:05
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
UA suspicious (short/empty) (+15), Danger strong hits: 2 (+50), Danger medium hits: 120 (+60)
2026-02-20 16:55:04
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 280/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Microsoft Corporation
AS8075 · 🇦🇺 Australia
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 20.42.209.0 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 20.42.209.0 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 20.42.209.0: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 20.42.209.0.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

20.42.209.0 has been assigned a threat score of 280/100 (Critical). This is a critical-level threat. Systems administrators should treat this IP as hostile and block all inbound connections without exception.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent AnomalyPath EnumerationRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

Our monitoring infrastructure has identified 20.42.209.0, geolocated to The Rocks, Australia, operating on the network of Microsoft Corporation, as a source of suspicious network activity. The address has been active for 2 days in our monitoring system, producing 40 flagged requests at a rate of ~20/day. The IP is classified as hosting/datacenter infrastructure, commonly associated with rented servers used for automated attack campaigns, botnet command-and-control, or vulnerability scanning at scale. With 3 different attack patterns detected, this IP exhibits behavior characteristic of advanced automated scanning frameworks. A score of 280/100 places this address in the top tier of severity. Block and investigate any historical connections.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇦🇺 Top threats from Australia

20.213.152.227 (280)20.5.72.178 (280)4.197.33.200 (280)20.5.80.84 (280)20.53.249.250 (280)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS8075

74.241.249.229 (340)20.151.111.128 (308)4.182.24.88 (285)20.65.61.3 (283)4.205.39.97 (283)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 HTTP Header Analysis for Threat Detection

Examining HTTP headers beyond User-Agent reveals attack tools and automated scripts. Missing standard headers, unusual ordering, non-standard values, and inconsistencies with claimed client identity all serve as reliable detection signals.

💡 Backup and Recovery Against Ransomware

Immutable, offline backups remain the most effective defense against ransomware. The 3-2-1 rule — three copies on two media types with one offsite — combined with regular recovery testing ensures business continuity after encryption attacks.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: