ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
20.151.225.23

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-07-30 00:53:53
First seen: 2026-07-18 16:22:27
Last seen: 2026-07-26 04:07:12
280

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 280/100. Total malicious requests observed: 6201.

BURSTDANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEUA_SUS
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
20.151.225.23
Type
Hosting
Country
🇨🇦 Canada
City
Toronto
ISP
Microsoft Corporation
Organization
Microsoft Azure Cloud (canadacentral)
Autonomous System
AS8075 Microsoft Corporation
Hit Count
6201
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
404 ratio >= 60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+25
Burst 16/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 17/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 18/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 20/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 21/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 22/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 23/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 24/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 54/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 57/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 63/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 64/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 67/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 69/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 70/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 71/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 72/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 73/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 74/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 75/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 76/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 77/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 78/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 79/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 80/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 81/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 82/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 84/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 85/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 86/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 88/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger medium hits: 117Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 127Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 155Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 175Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 184Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 185Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 186Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 261Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 276Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 277Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 278Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 75Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 84Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 91Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 92Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 93Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 99Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 103High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 109High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 122High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 20High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 29High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 30High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 32High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 38High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 39High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 43High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 49High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 55High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 60High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 67High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 71High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 77High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 79High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 82High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Probe 302→404Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
UA suspiciousBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+15
Σ = 3980
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-07-18 16:22:27
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
404 ratio 40-60% (+15), 404 ratio >= 60% (+25), Burst 16/2s (+35)
2026-07-26 04:07:12
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 280/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Microsoft Corporation
AS8075 · 🇨🇦 Canada
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 20.151.225.23 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 20.151.225.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Directory Scan Defense

IP 20.151.225.23 is enumerating directories. Configure fail2ban apache-404 jail after 10+ 404 errors. Disable directory listings. Normalize all 404 responses.

🌊 Traffic Flood Defense

IP 20.151.225.23 is generating excessive traffic. Limit connections per source IP. Enable geographic blocking if traffic from this region is unexpected.

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 20.151.225.23 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

07

Neighbors in 20.151.225.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

20.151.225.23 has been assigned a threat score of 280/100 (Critical). This is a critical-level threat. Systems administrators should treat this IP as hostile and block all inbound connections without exception.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path EnumerationRequest FloodingUser-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

IP address 20.151.225.23 has been traced to Toronto, Canada, operating on the network of Microsoft Corporation. Our threat detection systems have flagged this address based on observed malicious behavior patterns. Over a period of 7 days, this IP generated 6,201 malicious requests, averaging approximately 885.9 requests per day. This address belongs to a datacenter or cloud hosting provider. Hosting IPs are frequently leveraged by threat actors who rent cheap VPS instances specifically for conducting attacks. The diversity of 3 separate attack methods suggests a comprehensive attack toolkit — likely an automated scanner that tests for vulnerabilities across multiple categories. Our records show 103 malicious IPs originating from Canada, positioning it as a significant contributor to global threat activity. A score of 280/100 places this address in the top tier of severity. Block and investigate any historical connections.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇨🇦 Top threats from Canada

20.151.179.130 (308)20.151.111.128 (308)45.91.23.64 (305)45.91.23.164 (305)147.15.149.40 (300)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS8075

20.220.14.153 (280)20.104.74.38 (280)20.63.86.26 (280)20.220.62.118 (280)20.220.148.251 (280)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 File Upload Vulnerabilities

Insecure file upload functionality allows attackers to upload web shells, malware, or scripts that execute on the server. Proper validation must check file content, not just extensions, and uploaded files should be stored outside the web root.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: