ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
20.220.62.118

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-07-30 00:53:53
First seen: 2026-07-08 15:54:26
Last seen: 2026-07-12 00:57:39
280

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 280/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1857.

BURSTDANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEUA_SUS
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
20.220.62.118
Type
Hosting
Country
🇨🇦 Canada
City
Toronto
ISP
Microsoft Corporation
Organization
Microsoft Azure Cloud (canadacentral)
Autonomous System
AS8075 Microsoft Corporation
Hit Count
1857
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Burst 21/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 22/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 24/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 25/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 70/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 77/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 78/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 85/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 86/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 87/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 88/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger medium hits: 2Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+20
Danger medium hits: 261Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 273Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 410Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 428Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 856Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 112High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 2High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+50
Danger strong hits: 20High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 25High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 3High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+75
Danger strong hits: 35High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 56High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Probe 302→404Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
UA suspiciousBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+15
Σ = 1380
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-07-08 15:54:26
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
404 ratio 40-60% (+15), Burst 21/2s (+35), Burst 22/2s (+35)
2026-07-12 00:57:39
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 280/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Microsoft Corporation
AS8075 · 🇨🇦 Canada
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 20.220.62.118 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 20.220.62.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 20.220.62.118: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 20.220.62.118.

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 20.220.62.118 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

07

Neighbors in 20.220.62.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

20.220.62.118 has been assigned a threat score of 280/100 (Critical). This is a critical-level threat. Systems administrators should treat this IP as hostile and block all inbound connections without exception.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path EnumerationRequest FloodingUser-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

Network traffic from 20.220.62.118, located in Toronto, Canada, operating on the network of Microsoft Corporation, has been classified as malicious by our automated threat scoring engine. Our sensors captured 1,857 malicious requests from this address across a 3-day span, reflecting a sustained attack cadence of ~619 requests per day. Operating from datacenter infrastructure, this IP is typical of addresses used in organized attack operations. Cloud and VPS providers are commonly exploited as launching platforms for automated scanning. The diversity of 3 separate attack methods suggests a comprehensive attack toolkit — likely an automated scanner that tests for vulnerabilities across multiple categories. Canada currently accounts for 103 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. A score of 280/100 places this address in the top tier of severity. Block and investigate any historical connections.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇨🇦 Top threats from Canada

20.151.179.130 (308)20.151.111.128 (308)45.91.23.64 (305)45.91.23.164 (305)147.15.149.40 (300)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS8075

20.220.14.153 (280)20.104.74.38 (280)20.63.86.26 (280)20.220.148.251 (280)20.220.217.32 (280)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 Behavioral Analysis vs Signature Detection

Signature-based detection matches known attack patterns but misses novel threats. Behavioral analysis identifies anomalies in request patterns, timing, and volume, catching zero-day attacks that signatures cannot recognize.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: