ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
192.42.116.53

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-29 07:18:13
First seen: 2026-05-10 01:00:05
Last seen: 2026-05-29 07:08:54
73

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 73/100. Total malicious requests observed: 540.

BOT_UABURSTMETHODRATIO_404REFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
192.42.116.53
Type
Unknown
Country
🇤🇤 ??
City
Unknown
ISP
Unknown
Organization
Unknown
Autonomous System
Unknown
Hit Count
540
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Burst: 5 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Foreign refererReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
POST seenBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+8
UA bot: Go-http-clientKnown bot/crawler User-Agent detected+40
Σ = 118
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-05-10 01:00:05
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
404 ratio 40-60% (+15), Burst: 5 req / 2s (+35), Foreign referer (+10)
2026-05-29 07:08:54
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 73/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 192.42.116.53 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 192.42.116.0/24
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Directory Scan Defense

IP 192.42.116.53 is enumerating directories. Configure fail2ban apache-404 jail after 10+ 404 errors. Disable directory listings. Normalize all 404 responses.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 192.42.116.53.

🤖 Bot Detection

Address UA spoofing from 192.42.116.53: maintain blocklist of known malicious UA strings, require consistent UA across sessions, implement TLS fingerprinting.

07

Neighbors in 192.42.116.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

192.42.116.53 has been assigned a threat score of 73/100 (High). At this threat level, the IP is considered high risk. Firewall rules should be updated to deny traffic from this source.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path EnumerationRequest FloodingUser-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

IP address 192.42.116.53 has been traced to an unknown location. Our threat detection systems have flagged this address based on observed malicious behavior patterns. Over a period of 19 days, this IP generated 540 malicious requests, averaging approximately 28.4 requests per day. The combination of 3 distinct attack vectors indicates a sophisticated, multi-pronged threat actor deploying automated tools that probe multiple attack surfaces simultaneously. The score of 73/100 indicates a confirmed malicious actor. Network-level blocking is appropriate.

11

Related Threats

🇤🇤 Top threats from ??

View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 DNS Sinkholing for Malware Defense

DNS sinkholing redirects queries for known malicious domains to controlled IP addresses. This technique blocks malware communication, prevents data exfiltration, and identifies compromised internal hosts attempting to contact command-and-control servers.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: