ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
192.42.116.48

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-29 07:18:13
First seen: 2026-05-27 03:27:24
Last seen: 2026-05-29 07:16:54
73

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 73/100. Total malicious requests observed: 281.

BOT_UAMETHODRATIO_404REFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
192.42.116.48
Type
Unknown
Country
🇤🇤 ??
City
Unknown
ISP
Unknown
Organization
Unknown
Autonomous System
Unknown
Hit Count
281
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Foreign refererReferer from unrelated external domain+10
POST seenBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+8
UA bot: Go-http-clientKnown bot/crawler User-Agent detected+40
Σ = 73
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-05-27 03:27:24
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
404 ratio 40-60% (+15), Foreign referer (+10), POST seen (+8)
2026-05-29 07:16:54
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 73/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 192.42.116.48 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 192.42.116.0/24
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 192.42.116.48: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 192.42.116.48 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

07

Neighbors in 192.42.116.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

192.42.116.48 has been assigned a threat score of 73/100 (High). At this threat level, the IP is considered high risk. Firewall rules should be updated to deny traffic from this source.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path EnumerationUser-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

192.42.116.48 is registered in an unknown location. This IP first appeared in our threat feeds after triggering multiple behavioral detection signatures. Our sensors captured 281 malicious requests from this address across a 2-day span, reflecting a sustained attack cadence of ~140.5 requests per day. The dual attack vectors of Path Enumeration combined with User-Agent Anomaly indicate a coordinated assault rather than opportunistic scanning. A threat score of 73/100 places this IP in the high-risk category. Blocking at the firewall level is recommended.

11

Related Threats

🇤🇤 Top threats from ??

View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 TLS Fingerprinting (JA3/JA4)

TLS fingerprinting creates unique identifiers based on how clients negotiate encrypted connections. The JA3 and JA4 methods generate hashes from TLS ClientHello parameters, enabling identification of specific tools and malware regardless of IP address changes.

💡 Phishing Infrastructure Analysis

Modern phishing operations use sophisticated infrastructure including lookalike domains, valid TLS certificates, and evasion techniques like cloaking and geofencing. Analyzing this infrastructure reveals campaigns before they reach their targets.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: