ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
119.30.116.81

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-22 13:51:58
First seen: 2026-03-09 15:00:05
Last seen: 2026-03-09 15:00:05
68

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 68/100. Total malicious requests observed: 2.

DANGER_PATHRATIO_404METHOD
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
119.30.116.81
Type
Mobile
Country
🇵🇰 Pakistan
City
Islamabad
ISP
Mobilink GSM, Pakistan Mobile Communication Ltd.
Organization
Linkdotnet Telecom Limited
Autonomous System
AS58470 IX Peering for Mobilink and Link Direct International.
Hit Count
2
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger strong hits: 1High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+25
Danger medium hits: 1Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+10
404 ratio >= 60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+25
POST requests presentBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+8
Σ = 68
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-03-09 15:00:05
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger strong hits: 1 (+25), Danger medium hits: 1 (+10), 404 ratio >= 60% (+25)
2026-03-09 15:00:05
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 68/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Mobilink GSM, Pakistan Mobile Communication Ltd.
AS58470 · 🇵🇰 Pakistan
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 119.30.116.81 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 119.30.116.81: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

119.30.116.81 has been assigned a threat score of 68/100 (High). This score indicates high threat severity. The IP has shown clear patterns of malicious behavior that warrant immediate defensive measures.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path Enumeration

📊 Threat Analysis

119.30.116.81 is registered in Islamabad, Pakistan, operating on the network of Mobilink GSM, Pakistan Mobile Communication Ltd.. This IP first appeared in our threat feeds after triggering multiple behavioral detection signatures. Our sensors captured 2 malicious requests from this address across a 1-day span, reflecting a sustained attack cadence of ~2 requests per day. This is a mobile network IP. While mobile addresses are typically shared via CGNAT, persistent malicious activity from this specific address suggests automated abuse. Active path scanning has been detected — this IP probes for hundreds of common file and directory names. With 103 flagged addresses, Pakistan represents a significant presence in our threat database. The score of 68/100 warrants active monitoring and rate-limiting. Full blocking is advisable for sensitive systems.

11

Related Threats

🇵🇰 Top threats from Pakistan

113.192.47.123 (240)182.184.118.5 (235)173.239.196.170 (225)202.142.146.84 (210)103.84.56.36 (208)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS58470

119.30.118.41 (68)119.30.119.107 (68)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 API Abuse and Enumeration

Modern attacks increasingly target APIs rather than traditional web interfaces. Attackers enumerate endpoints, test for broken authentication, and exploit excessive data exposure. API attacks are harder to detect as they mimic legitimate programmatic access patterns.

💡 Behavioral Analysis vs Signature Detection

Signature-based detection matches known attack patterns but misses novel threats. Behavioral analysis identifies anomalies in request patterns, timing, and volume, catching zero-day attacks that signatures cannot recognize.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: