IP Threat Report
103.66.148.75
ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED
Geolocation & Classification
Detection Signatures
| Signature | Description | Points | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danger strong hits: 1 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +25 | |
| Danger medium hits: 1 | Medium-risk: admin panels, config files | +10 | |
| POST requests present | Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis | +8 | |
| 404 ratio >= 60% | Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration | +25 |
Observed Activity
Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
Timeline
Network Provider
Recommendations
Actions taken & recommended
- IP 103.66.148.75 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
- Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
- Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
- Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web
🔎 Path Enumeration Protection
Block scanning from 103.66.148.75: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.
Open Ports & Services
Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8889 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8889 |
| 16100 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 16100 |
| 16101 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 16101 |
| 16103 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 16103 |
| 16104 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 16104 |
| CVE ID | Link |
|---|---|
| CVE-2019-11358 | NVD → |
| CVE-2020-11023 | NVD → |
| CVE-2018-19052 | NVD → |
| CVE-2015-9251 | NVD → |
| CVE-2019-11072 | NVD → |
| CVE-2020-11022 | NVD → |
| CVE-2012-6708 | NVD → |
| CVE-2020-7656 | NVD → |
🔴 This host has 8 known CVEs associated with its exposed services. Multiple vulnerabilities suggest gaps in patch management. Review each CVE in the NVD database.
Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.
Blacklist Status (DNSBL)
This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.
Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.
Threat Analysis
103.66.148.75 has been assigned a threat score of 68/100 (High). The IP is rated as a high-level threat. Network administrators should implement blocking rules and monitor for any connections from this address.
The following attack categories were identified:
📊 Threat Analysis
103.66.148.75 is registered in Sialkot, Pakistan, operating on the network of Sambrial Cable Network. This IP first appeared in our threat feeds after triggering multiple behavioral detection signatures. The address has been active for 16 days in our monitoring system, producing 3 flagged requests at a rate of ~0.2/day. This residential IP is likely a compromised consumer device. Home routers and IoT equipment with default credentials are prime targets for botnet operators. The IP exhibits directory enumeration behavior, systematically requesting non-existent paths to discover hidden files and misconfigured resources. Our records show 104 malicious IPs originating from Pakistan, positioning it as a significant contributor to global threat activity. At 68/100, this IP presents a meaningful threat. Implement rate limiting with escalation to blocking.
This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.
Related Threats
🇵🇰 Top threats from Pakistan
113.192.47.123 (240)182.184.118.5 (235)173.239.196.170 (225)202.142.146.84 (210)103.84.56.36 (208)View all →Security Intelligence
💡 HTTP Request Smuggling
Request smuggling exploits differences in how front-end and back-end servers parse HTTP requests. This technique can bypass security controls, poison web caches, and hijack other users sessions by desynchronizing request boundaries.
💡 Passive DNS for Threat Hunting
Passive DNS databases record historical DNS resolution data, enabling analysts to track domain changes, identify related infrastructure, and discover malicious domains sharing hosting with known threats. This historical context is invaluable for threat investigation.