IP威胁报告
94.229.71.117
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点，否则你将被曝光
地理位置与分类
检测签名
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 404 ratio 40-60% | 大多数请求返回404——目录枚举 | +15 | |
| Danger medium hits: 3 | 中等风险：管理面板、配置文件 | +30 | |
| Foreign referer | 来自无关外部域名的Referer | +10 | |
| Probe 302→404 | 自动分析检测到行为异常 | +20 |
观察到的活动
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑，目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
时间线
网络供应商
建议
已采取和建议的措施
- IP 94.229.71.117 已在应用层封锁（HTTP 403）
- 建议在防火墙层（iptables/CSF）进行封锁
- 通过abuse联系方式向网络供应商举报
- 确保敏感文件（.env、.git、备份）无法从网络访问
🔎 目录扫描防御
IP 94.229.71.117正在枚举目录。在10次以上404错误后配置fail2ban apache-404 jail。禁用目录列表。
黑名单状态 (DNSBL)
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查：Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
Threat Analysis
94.229.71.117 has been assigned a threat score of 75/100 (High). 该IP被评为高级别威胁。网络管理员应实施阻止规则并监控来自此地址的任何连接。
The following attack categories were identified:
📊 Threat Analysis
IP地址94.229.71.117已追溯至London, United Kingdom，运营在UK Dedicated Servers Limited的网络中。我们的威胁检测系统根据观察到的恶意行为模式标记了此地址。 我们的传感器在1天内捕获了来自此地址的35次恶意请求，反映出每天约35次的持续攻击节奏。 被归类为托管IP，此地址可能运行在租用的服务器或云实例上。攻击者偏好数据中心IP因其高带宽和一次性特点。 该IP表现出目录枚举行为，系统地请求不存在的路径以发现隐藏文件和配置错误的资源。 United Kingdom目前在我们的数据库中占3,207个被封锁IP，使其成为恶意流量的主要来源。 威胁评分75/100将此IP置于高风险类别。建议在防火墙级别进行封锁。
This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.
Related Threats
🇬🇧 Top threats from United Kingdom
45.86.203.126 (350)45.138.12.41 (350)91.230.225.114 (350)45.138.12.46 (350)185.192.71.72 (350)View all →🏢 Same network: AS42831
45.86.203.126 (350)194.32.120.30 (320)194.32.120.103 (320)194.32.120.214 (305)194.32.120.58 (305)View all →Security Intelligence
💡 Credential Stuffing at Scale
Credential stuffing uses stolen username-password pairs from data breaches to attempt logins across many websites. Since users frequently reuse passwords, these automated attacks achieve success rates of 0.1-2%, which translates to thousands of compromised accounts from millions of attempts.
💡 Memory Safety and Buffer Overflows
Buffer overflow vulnerabilities remain relevant in C/C++ applications despite decades of mitigation efforts. Modern protections like ASLR, stack canaries, and DEP reduce exploitability but determined attackers continue finding bypass techniques.