IP威胁报告
91.229.105.149
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点，否则你将被曝光
地理位置与分类
检测签名
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danger strong hits: 8 | 高风险路径：Webshell、RCE、漏洞利用 | +100 | |
| Danger medium hits: 4 | 中等风险：管理面板、配置文件 | +40 | |
| 404 ratio 40-60% | 大多数请求返回404——目录枚举 | +15 | |
| Foreign referer seen | 来自无关外部域名的Referer | +10 |
观察到的活动
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑，目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
时间线
网络供应商
建议
已采取和建议的措施
- IP 91.229.105.149 已在应用层封锁（HTTP 403）
- 建议在防火墙层（iptables/CSF）进行封锁
- 通过abuse联系方式向网络供应商举报
- 确保敏感文件（.env、.git、备份）无法从网络访问
🔎 目录扫描防御
IP 91.229.105.149正在枚举目录。在10次以上404错误后配置fail2ban apache-404 jail。禁用目录列表。
开放端口和服务
来自Shodan的网络侦察数据。开放端口可能表示正在运行的服务、错误配置或潜在的攻击面。
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3389 | RDP | High | Remote Desktop Protocol — primary target for ransomware attacks |
| 5432 | PostgreSQL | High | PostgreSQL database — direct database access risk |
| 5433 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 5433 |
| 6000 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6000 |
| 6002 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6002 |
| 6348 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6348 |
| 6352 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6352 |
| 6363 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6363 |
| 6379 | Redis | Critical | Redis in-memory database — frequently misconfigured without auth |
| 6400 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6400 |
| 6405 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6405 |
| 6432 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6432 |
| 6433 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6433 |
| 6440 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6440 |
| 6443 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6443 |
| 6955 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6955 |
| 6998 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6998 |
| 7001 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7001 |
| 7003 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7003 |
| 7005 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7005 |
| 7012 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7012 |
| 7013 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7013 |
| 7014 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7014 |
| 7015 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7015 |
| 7016 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7016 |
| 7018 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7018 |
| 7021 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7021 |
| 7022 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7022 |
| 7025 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7025 |
| 7057 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7057 |
| 7071 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7071 |
| 7078 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7078 |
| 7080 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7080 |
| 7081 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7081 |
| 7083 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7083 |
| 7084 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7084 |
| 7085 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7085 |
| 7086 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7086 |
| 7087 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7087 |
| 7088 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7088 |
| 7090 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7090 |
| 7100 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7100 |
| 7105 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7105 |
| 7170 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7170 |
| 7171 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7171 |
| 7172 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7172 |
| 7173 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7173 |
| 7218 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7218 |
| 8502 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8502 |
| 9001 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 9001 |
⚠️ 在91.229.105.149上检测到3个高风险端口。暴露的RDP (3389)是勒索软件攻击的首要入口。 开放的数据库端口表明可能存在数据泄露风险。 这些服务在没有严格防火墙规则的情况下不应公开访问。
数据来源：Shodan InternetDB。独立于abuse.mom进行扫描。
黑名单状态 (DNSBL)
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查：Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
Threat Analysis
91.229.105.149 has been assigned a threat score of 165/100 (Critical). 如此高的分数标志着一个关键威胁行为者。该地址在多个检测向量上表现出持续的、激进的恶意行为。
The following attack categories were identified:
📊 Threat Analysis
威胁情报分析将91.229.105.149与来自New York, United States，运营在PureVoltage Hosting Inc.的网络中的恶意活动相关联。该地址自首次检测以来一直处于观察状态。 在1天的时间内，此IP产生了1次恶意请求，平均每天约1次请求。 该IP被归类为托管/数据中心基础设施，通常与用于自动化攻击活动、僵尸网络命令控制或大规模漏洞扫描的租用服务器相关联。 该IP表现出目录枚举行为，系统地请求不存在的路径以发现隐藏文件和配置错误的资源。 United States目前在我们的数据库中占198个被封锁IP，使其成为恶意流量的重要来源。 威胁评分165/100，此IP属于我们数据库中最危险的地址之一。强烈建议立即完全封锁。
This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.
Related Threats
🇺🇸 Top threats from United States
104.28.246.115 (350)104.28.246.113 (340)104.28.246.116 (340)104.28.235.58 (340)104.28.246.122 (340)View all →Security Intelligence
💡 Brute Force Attack Mechanics
Brute force attacks systematically try username and password combinations to gain unauthorized access. Modern attacks leverage credential databases from previous breaches, testing millions of combinations using distributed botnets across multiple IP addresses.
💡 Responsible Disclosure Ethics
Responsible disclosure balances public safety with giving vendors time to patch vulnerabilities. The security community generally supports coordinated disclosure timelines, but disagreements about appropriate timeframes and full disclosure continue to drive policy debates.