IP威胁报告
62.183.72.105
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点，否则你将被曝光
地理位置与分类
检测签名
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burst 20/10s | 请求频率异常——自动扫描 | +35 | |
| Burst 20/2s | 请求频率异常——自动扫描 | +35 | |
| Foreign referer | 来自无关外部域名的Referer | +10 |
观察到的活动
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑，目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
时间线
网络供应商
建议
已采取和建议的措施
- IP 62.183.72.105 已在应用层封锁（HTTP 403）
- 建议在防火墙层（iptables/CSF）进行封锁
- 通过abuse联系方式向网络供应商举报
- 确保敏感文件（.env、.git、备份）无法从网络访问
🌊 洪水/DDoS缓解
在nginx中实施limit_req_zone。部署具有DDoS防护的CDN。配置SYN cookies和连接跟踪以限制62.183.72.105。
黑名单状态 (DNSBL)
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查：Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
Threat Analysis
62.183.72.105 has been assigned a threat score of 80/100 (Critical). 如此高的分数标志着一个关键威胁行为者。该地址在多个检测向量上表现出持续的、激进的恶意行为。
The following attack categories were identified:
📊 Threat Analysis
IP地址62.183.72.105已追溯至Krasnodar, Russia，运营在Southen Telecommunication Maintainer的网络中。我们的威胁检测系统根据观察到的恶意行为模式标记了此地址。 在3天的时间内，此IP产生了68次恶意请求，平均每天约22.7次请求。 这是一个住宅IP地址，表明可能是被入侵的家用设备，如路由器、智能设备或参与僵尸网络的受感染工作站。 来自此IP的基于速率的攻击旨在通过大量请求洪水压垮服务器资源。 Russia目前在我们的数据库中占2,650个被封锁IP，使其成为恶意流量的主要来源。 威胁评分80/100将此IP置于高风险类别。建议在防火墙级别进行封锁。
This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.
Related Threats
🇷🇺 Top threats from Russia
157.22.102.172 (313)178.130.54.159 (288)213.183.54.30 (275)185.50.25.14 (273)185.103.167.63 (265)View all →🏢 Same network: AS25490
View all →Security Intelligence
💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches
Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.
💡 Data Breach Impact Assessment
The impact of data breaches extends beyond immediate financial losses. Regulatory fines, legal liability, reputational damage, and customer churn create long-term costs that often exceed the direct costs of incident response and remediation.