
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点,否则你将被曝光
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 404 ratio 40-60% | 大多数请求返回404——目录枚举 | +15 | |
| Probe pattern 302->404 same path | 自动分析检测到行为异常 | +20 | |
| Burst: 23 req / 2s | 请求频率异常——自动扫描 | +35 | |
| Burst: 24 req / 10s | 请求频率异常——自动扫描 | +35 | |
| UA bot: python | 检测到已知机器人/爬虫的User-Agent | +40 |
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑,目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
IP 57.129.106.133正在枚举目录。在10次以上404错误后配置fail2ban apache-404 jail。禁用目录列表。
在nginx中实施limit_req_zone。部署具有DDoS防护的CDN。配置SYN cookies和连接跟踪以限制57.129.106.133。
IP 57.129.106.133显示可疑的UA行为。阻止空User-Agent请求。为敏感端点实施基于JavaScript的机器人检测。
来自Shodan的网络侦察数据。开放端口可能表示正在运行的服务、错误配置或潜在的攻击面。
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | SSH | Low | Secure Shell — common brute force target for remote access |
| 80 | HTTP | Low | HTTP web server — standard web traffic |
| 443 | HTTPS | Low | HTTPS web server — encrypted web traffic |
| 2066 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 2066 |
| 2096 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 2096 |
| 2100 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 2100 |
| 2196 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 2196 |
| 2200 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 2200 |
| 2259 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 2259 |
| 3089 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 3089 |
| CVE ID | Link |
|---|---|
| CVE-2007-2768 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-51767 | NVD → |
| CVE-2008-3844 | NVD → |
🔴 此主机有3个已知CVE与其暴露的服务相关联。多个漏洞表明补丁管理存在漏洞。 请在NVD数据库中查看每个CVE的详细信息。
数据来源:Shodan InternetDB。独立于abuse.mom进行扫描。
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查:Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
57.129.106.133 has been assigned a threat score of 105/100 (Critical). 这将其归入严重威胁类别。强烈建议在所有网络边界立即进行封锁。
The following attack categories were identified:
IP地址57.129.106.133已追溯至Frankfurt am Main, Germany,运营在OVH SAS的网络中。我们的威胁检测系统根据观察到的恶意行为模式标记了此地址。 在其8天的观察窗口期间,我们记录了来自此IP的4次敌对请求——平均每天约0.5次。 该IP从数据中心基础设施运营,是有组织攻击行动中使用的典型地址。 3种不同攻击向量的组合表明这是一个复杂的多方位威胁行为者,部署自动化工具同时探测多个攻击面。 Germany目前在我们的数据库中占104个被封锁IP,使其成为恶意流量的重要来源。 评分105/100将此地址置于最高严重性级别。应封锁并调查任何历史连接。
This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.
Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.
Mobile carrier NAT (CGNAT) means thousands of users share a single public IP, making mobile IPs unreliable for reputation scoring. However, mobile networks are increasingly used as attack platforms through compromised apps and malicious SDKs.