
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点,否则你将被曝光
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danger strong hits: 1 | 高风险路径:Webshell、RCE、漏洞利用 | +25 | |
| Danger medium hits: 1 | 中等风险:管理面板、配置文件 | +10 | |
| 404 ratio >= 60% | 大多数请求返回404——目录枚举 | +25 | |
| POST requests present | 自动分析检测到行为异常 | +8 | |
| Danger strong hits: 3 | 高风险路径:Webshell、RCE、漏洞利用 | +75 | |
| Danger medium hits: 2 | 中等风险:管理面板、配置文件 | +20 | |
| Foreign referer seen | 来自无关外部域名的Referer | +10 | |
| Danger strong hits: 2 | 高风险路径:Webshell、RCE、漏洞利用 | +50 | |
| 404 ratio 40-60% | 大多数请求返回404——目录枚举 | +15 |
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑,目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
IP 52.173.162.96正在枚举目录。在10次以上404错误后配置fail2ban apache-404 jail。禁用目录列表。
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查:Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
52.173.162.96 has been assigned a threat score of 113/100 (Critical). 这是一个严重级别的威胁。系统管理员应将此IP视为敌对地址,无例外地阻止所有入站连接。
The following attack categories were identified:
地址52.173.162.96来源于Des Moines, United States,运营在Microsoft Corporation的网络中。它是通过对受监控端点的入站网络流量进行自动分析而被识别的。 我们的传感器在1天内捕获了来自此地址的10次恶意请求,反映出每天约10次的持续攻击节奏。 被归类为托管IP,此地址可能运行在租用的服务器或云实例上。攻击者偏好数据中心IP因其高带宽和一次性特点。 该IP表现出目录枚举行为,系统地请求不存在的路径以发现隐藏文件和配置错误的资源。 我们的记录显示来自United States的101个恶意IP,使其成为全球威胁活动的重要贡献者。 评分113/100将此地址置于最高严重性级别。应封锁并调查任何历史连接。
This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.
WordPress sites face constant automated attacks targeting xmlrpc.php for brute force amplification, wp-login.php for credential theft, and vulnerable plugins for remote code execution. Over 90% of CMS-based attacks specifically target WordPress installations.
When multiple IPs in a subnet show malicious behavior, subnet blocking efficiently neutralizes the threat. However, overly broad blocking risks impacting legitimate users. Analysis of subnet ownership and historical behavior guides appropriate blocking scope.