IP威胁报告
5.175.178.136
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点，否则你将被曝光
地理位置与分类
检测签名
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burst 18/2s | 请求频率异常——自动扫描 | +35 | |
| Burst 19/10s | 请求频率异常——自动扫描 | +35 | |
| Burst 19/2s | 请求频率异常——自动扫描 | +35 | |
| Foreign referer | 来自无关外部域名的Referer | +10 |
观察到的活动
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑，目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
时间线
网络供应商
建议
已采取和建议的措施
- IP 5.175.178.136 已在应用层封锁（HTTP 403）
- 建议在防火墙层（iptables/CSF）进行封锁
- 通过abuse联系方式向网络供应商举报
- 确保敏感文件（.env、.git、备份）无法从网络访问
🌊 洪水/DDoS缓解
在nginx中实施limit_req_zone。部署具有DDoS防护的CDN。配置SYN cookies和连接跟踪以限制5.175.178.136。
黑名单状态 (DNSBL)
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查：Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
Threat Analysis
5.175.178.136 has been assigned a threat score of 80/100 (Critical). 这将其归入严重威胁类别。强烈建议在所有网络边界立即进行封锁。
The following attack categories were identified:
📊 Threat Analysis
IP地址5.175.178.136已追溯至Tallinn, EE，运营在Raul Ghita trading as 'Ghita Telekom'的网络中。我们的威胁检测系统根据观察到的恶意行为模式标记了此地址。 我们的传感器在4天内捕获了来自此地址的410次恶意请求，反映出每天约102.5次的持续攻击节奏。 此IP被识别为VPN或代理端点，通常用于掩盖攻击流量的真实来源并绕过地理或信誉封锁。 来自此IP的基于速率的攻击旨在通过大量请求洪水压垮服务器资源。 我们的记录显示来自EE的49个恶意IP，使其成为全球威胁活动的值得注意的贡献者。 威胁评分80/100将此IP置于高风险类别。建议在防火墙级别进行封锁。
This IP is associated with a VPN or proxy service. Attackers frequently route their traffic through anonymizing services to obscure their true location. This makes attribution more challenging but the malicious behavior patterns remain detectable.
Related Threats
🇪🇪 Top threats from EE
5.157.5.149 (150)85.254.13.161 (143)194.4.169.86 (140)194.4.171.123 (140)5.157.5.129 (140)View all →🏢 Same network: AS214639
View all →Security Intelligence
💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches
Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.
💡 Supply Chain Security Challenges
Attacks targeting software supply chains compromise trusted update mechanisms to distribute malware at scale. Dependency confusion, typosquatting in package registries, and compromised build pipelines threaten even organizations with strong direct security postures.