IP威胁报告
45.156.129.153
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点，否则你将被曝光
地理位置与分类
检测签名
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danger strong hits: 3 | 高风险路径：Webshell、RCE、漏洞利用 | +75 | |
| Foreign referer seen | 来自无关外部域名的Referer | +10 | |
| Probe pattern 302->404 same path | 自动分析检测到行为异常 | +20 | |
| Danger strong hits: 1 | 高风险路径：Webshell、RCE、漏洞利用 | +25 |
观察到的活动
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑，目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
时间线
网络供应商
建议
已采取和建议的措施
- IP 45.156.129.153 已在应用层封锁（HTTP 403）
- 建议在防火墙层（iptables/CSF）进行封锁
- 在同一/24子网中检测到其他恶意IP——建议封锁 45.156.129.0/24
- 通过abuse联系方式向网络供应商举报
- 确保敏感文件（.env、.git、备份）无法从网络访问
🔎 目录扫描防御
IP 45.156.129.153正在枚举目录。在10次以上404错误后配置fail2ban apache-404 jail。禁用目录列表。
邻居在 45.156.129.0/24
来自同一/24子网的其他被封锁IP——表明该网络范围存在系统性滥用。
黑名单状态 (DNSBL)
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查：Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
Threat Analysis
45.156.129.153 has been assigned a threat score of 105/100 (Critical). 这是一个严重级别的威胁。系统管理员应将此IP视为敌对地址，无例外地阻止所有入站连接。
The following attack categories were identified:
📊 Threat Analysis
我们的监控基础设施已将45.156.129.153（地理位置为Chicago, United States，运营在NSEC - Sistemas Informaticos, S.A.的网络中）识别为可疑网络活动的来源。 该地址在我们的监控系统中活跃了15天，产生了3次标记请求，速率约为每天0.2次。 该地址被归类为住宅，意味着它可能属于终端用户ISP连接。来自住宅IP的恶意活动通常表明设备已被入侵或属于僵尸网络。 该IP表现出目录枚举行为，系统地请求不存在的路径以发现隐藏文件和配置错误的资源。 我们的记录显示来自United States的43个恶意IP，使其成为全球威胁活动的值得注意的贡献者。 评分105/100将此地址置于最高严重性级别。应封锁并调查任何历史连接。
This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.
Related Threats
🇺🇸 Top threats from United States
45.156.129.176 (130)45.156.129.156 (125)45.156.129.116 (120)45.156.129.95 (118)45.156.129.164 (110)View all →Security Intelligence
💡 Credential Stuffing at Scale
Credential stuffing uses stolen username-password pairs from data breaches to attempt logins across many websites. Since users frequently reuse passwords, these automated attacks achieve success rates of 0.1-2%, which translates to thousands of compromised accounts from millions of attempts.
💡 Subnet-Level vs IP-Level Blocking
When multiple IPs in a subnet show malicious behavior, subnet blocking efficiently neutralizes the threat. However, overly broad blocking risks impacting legitimate users. Analysis of subnet ownership and historical behavior guides appropriate blocking scope.