
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点,否则你将被曝光
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danger strong hits: 2 | 高风险路径:Webshell、RCE、漏洞利用 | +50 | |
| Burst: 14 req / 2s | 请求频率异常——自动扫描 | +35 | |
| Burst: 14 req / 10s | 请求频率异常——自动扫描 | +35 | |
| Foreign referer seen | 来自无关外部域名的Referer | +10 |
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑,目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
在nginx中实施limit_req_zone。部署具有DDoS防护的CDN。配置SYN cookies和连接跟踪以限制23.80.6.5。
来自Shodan的网络侦察数据。开放端口可能表示正在运行的服务、错误配置或潜在的攻击面。
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 88 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 88 |
| 123 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 123 |
| 593 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 593 |
| 3268 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 3268 |
| 3389 | RDP | High | Remote Desktop Protocol — primary target for ransomware attacks |
| 5985 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 5985 |
⚠️ 在23.80.6.5上检测到1个高风险端口。暴露的RDP (3389)是勒索软件攻击的首要入口。 这些服务在没有严格防火墙规则的情况下不应公开访问。
数据来源:Shodan InternetDB。独立于abuse.mom进行扫描。
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查:Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
23.80.6.5 has been assigned a threat score of 130/100 (Critical). 这将其归入严重威胁类别。强烈建议在所有网络边界立即进行封锁。
The following attack categories were identified:
IP地址23.80.6.5已追溯至Los Angeles, United States,运营在Leaseweb USA, Inc.的网络中。我们的威胁检测系统根据观察到的恶意行为模式标记了此地址。 该地址在我们的监控系统中活跃了1天,产生了1次标记请求,速率约为每天1次。 被归类为托管IP,此地址可能运行在租用的服务器或云实例上。攻击者偏好数据中心IP因其高带宽和一次性特点。 来自此IP的基于速率的攻击旨在通过大量请求洪水压垮服务器资源。 我们的记录显示来自United States的152个恶意IP,使其成为全球威胁活动的重要贡献者。 威胁评分130/100,此IP属于我们数据库中最危险的地址之一。强烈建议立即完全封锁。
This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.
Credential stuffing uses stolen username-password pairs from data breaches to attempt logins across many websites. Since users frequently reuse passwords, these automated attacks achieve success rates of 0.1-2%, which translates to thousands of compromised accounts from millions of attempts.
When multiple IPs in a subnet show malicious behavior, subnet blocking efficiently neutralizes the threat. However, overly broad blocking risks impacting legitimate users. Analysis of subnet ownership and historical behavior guides appropriate blocking scope.