
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点,否则你将被曝光
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| UA changed for same IP | 多个User-Agent——机器人轮换技术 | +25 | |
| Danger medium hits: 8 | 中等风险:管理面板、配置文件 | +60 | |
| Probe pattern 302->404 same path | 自动分析检测到行为异常 | +20 | |
| Foreign referer seen | 来自无关外部域名的Referer | +10 | |
| Imported from old blocklist | 自动分析检测到行为异常 | +0 | |
| Danger medium hits: 4 | 中等风险:管理面板、配置文件 | +40 | |
| Danger medium hits: 10 | 中等风险:管理面板、配置文件 | +60 | |
| 404 ratio 40-60% | 大多数请求返回404——目录枚举 | +15 |
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑,目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
IP 193.33.66.58显示可疑的UA行为。阻止空User-Agent请求。为敏感端点实施基于JavaScript的机器人检测。
IP 193.33.66.58正在枚举目录。在10次以上404错误后配置fail2ban apache-404 jail。禁用目录列表。
来自Shodan的网络侦察数据。开放端口可能表示正在运行的服务、错误配置或潜在的攻击面。
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3389 | RDP | High | Remote Desktop Protocol — primary target for ransomware attacks |
| 5432 | PostgreSQL | High | PostgreSQL database — direct database access risk |
| 5433 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 5433 |
| 6000 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6000 |
| 6002 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6002 |
| 6348 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6348 |
| 6352 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6352 |
| 6363 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6363 |
| 6379 | Redis | Critical | Redis in-memory database — frequently misconfigured without auth |
| 6380 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6380 |
| 6400 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6400 |
| 6405 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6405 |
| 6432 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6432 |
| 6433 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6433 |
| 6440 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6440 |
| 6443 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6443 |
| 6887 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6887 |
| 6955 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6955 |
| 7001 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7001 |
| 7002 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7002 |
| 7003 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7003 |
| 7004 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7004 |
| 7005 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7005 |
| 7010 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7010 |
| 7014 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7014 |
| 7018 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7018 |
| 7020 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7020 |
| 7021 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7021 |
| 7022 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7022 |
| 7057 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7057 |
| 7070 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7070 |
| 7071 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7071 |
| 7078 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7078 |
| 7079 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7079 |
| 7082 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7082 |
| 7083 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7083 |
| 7084 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7084 |
| 7085 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7085 |
| 7087 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7087 |
| 7090 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7090 |
| 7100 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7100 |
| 7105 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7105 |
| 7171 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7171 |
| 7173 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7173 |
| 7218 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7218 |
| 8502 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8502 |
⚠️ 在193.33.66.58上检测到3个高风险端口。暴露的RDP (3389)是勒索软件攻击的首要入口。 开放的数据库端口表明可能存在数据泄露风险。 这些服务在没有严格防火墙规则的情况下不应公开访问。
数据来源:Shodan InternetDB。独立于abuse.mom进行扫描。
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查:Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
193.33.66.58 has been assigned a threat score of 115/100 (Critical). 这代表着极高风险等级。我们的检测系统已从该地址标记出多个高置信度的恶意意图指标。
The following attack categories were identified:
威胁情报分析将193.33.66.58与来自Waubay, United States,运营在PureVoltage Hosting Inc.的网络中的恶意活动相关联。该地址自首次检测以来一直处于观察状态。 在27天的时间内,此IP产生了7次恶意请求,平均每天约0.3次请求。 被归类为托管IP,此地址可能运行在租用的服务器或云实例上。攻击者偏好数据中心IP因其高带宽和一次性特点。 识别出两种攻击模式(User-Agent Anomaly和Path Enumeration),表明这是一个针对多个漏洞的半自动化攻击活动。 United States目前在我们的数据库中占198个被封锁IP,使其成为恶意流量的重要来源。 评分115/100将此地址置于最高严重性级别。应封锁并调查任何历史连接。
This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.
Analyzing User-Agent strings reveals automated tools masquerading as legitimate browsers. Inconsistencies between claimed browser capabilities and actual behavior, impossible version combinations, and known scanner signatures help identify malicious clients.
SSH servers face constant brute force attacks targeting common usernames and weak passwords. Key-based authentication, fail2ban, non-standard ports, and IP allowlisting dramatically reduce the attack surface. Monitoring auth logs reveals active campaigns and compromised credentials.