
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点,否则你将被曝光
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danger medium hits: 4 | 中等风险:管理面板、配置文件 | +40 | |
| Probe pattern 302->404 same path | 自动分析检测到行为异常 | +20 | |
| Foreign referer seen | 来自无关外部域名的Referer | +10 |
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑,目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
IP 193.109.221.231正在枚举目录。在10次以上404错误后配置fail2ban apache-404 jail。禁用目录列表。
来自Shodan的网络侦察数据。开放端口可能表示正在运行的服务、错误配置或潜在的攻击面。
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3389 | RDP | High | Remote Desktop Protocol — primary target for ransomware attacks |
| 5432 | PostgreSQL | High | PostgreSQL database — direct database access risk |
| 6000 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6000 |
| 6002 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6002 |
| 6008 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6008 |
| 6348 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6348 |
| 6379 | Redis | Critical | Redis in-memory database — frequently misconfigured without auth |
| 6400 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6400 |
| 6405 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6405 |
| 6432 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6432 |
| 6433 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6433 |
| 6440 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6440 |
| 6443 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6443 |
| 6955 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6955 |
| 7000 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7000 |
| 7001 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7001 |
| 7002 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7002 |
| 7003 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7003 |
| 7004 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7004 |
| 7005 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7005 |
| 7006 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7006 |
| 7007 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7007 |
| 7010 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7010 |
| 7012 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7012 |
| 7015 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7015 |
| 7016 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7016 |
| 7018 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7018 |
| 7020 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7020 |
| 7021 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7021 |
| 7022 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7022 |
| 7025 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7025 |
| 7050 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7050 |
| 7057 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7057 |
| 7071 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7071 |
| 7082 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7082 |
| 7084 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7084 |
| 7086 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7086 |
| 7087 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7087 |
| 7088 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7088 |
| 7090 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7090 |
| 7100 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7100 |
| 7105 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7105 |
| 7171 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7171 |
| 7172 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7172 |
| 7173 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7173 |
| 7218 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7218 |
| 8502 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8502 |
| 9001 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 9001 |
⚠️ 在193.109.221.231上检测到3个高风险端口。暴露的RDP (3389)是勒索软件攻击的首要入口。 开放的数据库端口表明可能存在数据泄露风险。 这些服务在没有严格防火墙规则的情况下不应公开访问。
数据来源:Shodan InternetDB。独立于abuse.mom进行扫描。
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查:Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
193.109.221.231 has been assigned a threat score of 70/100 (High). 这将其归类为高严重性威胁。建议对敏感基础设施进行主动封锁。
The following attack categories were identified:
IP地址193.109.221.231已追溯至West Bend, United States,运营在PureVoltage Hosting Inc.的网络中。我们的威胁检测系统根据观察到的恶意行为模式标记了此地址。 在1天的时间内,此IP产生了1次恶意请求,平均每天约1次请求。 该IP从数据中心基础设施运营,是有组织攻击行动中使用的典型地址。 该IP表现出目录枚举行为,系统地请求不存在的路径以发现隐藏文件和配置错误的资源。 我们的记录显示来自United States的199个恶意IP,使其成为全球威胁活动的重要贡献者。 威胁评分70/100将此IP置于高风险类别。建议在防火墙级别进行封锁。
This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.
Vulnerability scanning is the automated process of probing web applications for known weaknesses. Attackers use tools like Nuclei, Nikto, and ZAP to test thousands of hosts per hour, looking for exposed configuration files, outdated software, and default credentials.
Blocking traffic from specific countries reduces attack surface but impacts legitimate international users. Effective geo-based policies use tiered approaches — blocking, rate limiting, or requiring additional verification based on risk assessment.