
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点,否则你将被曝光
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| UA suspicious (short/empty) | 自动分析检测到行为异常 | +15 | |
| Danger strong hits: 2 | 高风险路径:Webshell、RCE、漏洞利用 | +50 | |
| Danger strong hits: 1 | 高风险路径:Webshell、RCE、漏洞利用 | +25 |
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑,目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
IP 192.236.146.245显示可疑的UA行为。阻止空User-Agent请求。为敏感端点实施基于JavaScript的机器人检测。
来自Shodan的网络侦察数据。开放端口可能表示正在运行的服务、错误配置或潜在的攻击面。
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | SSH | Low | Secure Shell — common brute force target for remote access |
| 25 | SMTP | Medium | SMTP mail server — can be abused for spam relay |
| 1234 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 1234 |
| 8080 | HTTP-Alt | Low | HTTP alternative port — often used for admin panels or proxies |
| CVE ID | Link |
|---|---|
| CVE-2008-3844 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-26465 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-51767 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-51385 | NVD → |
| CVE-2016-20012 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-32728 | NVD → |
| CVE-2021-41617 | NVD → |
| CVE-2007-2768 | NVD → |
| CVE-2021-36368 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-38408 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-48795 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-6387 | NVD → |
🔴 此主机有12个已知CVE与其暴露的服务相关联。如此大量的漏洞强烈表明软件严重过时。 请在NVD数据库中查看每个CVE的详细信息。
数据来源:Shodan InternetDB。独立于abuse.mom进行扫描。
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查:Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
192.236.146.245 has been assigned a threat score of 65/100 (High). 这将其归类为高严重性威胁。建议对敏感基础设施进行主动封锁。
The following attack categories were identified:
威胁情报分析将192.236.146.245与来自Amsterdam, Netherlands,运营在Hostwinds LLC.的网络中的恶意活动相关联。该地址自首次检测以来一直处于观察状态。 在其3天的观察窗口期间,我们记录了来自此IP的2次敌对请求——平均每天约0.7次。 从住宅网络运营,此IP可能代表一个被入侵的家庭网关或已被招募到更大攻击基础设施中的IoT设备。 检测到可疑的User-Agent异常,包括空的、伪造的或快速轮换的UA字符串——自动化扫描工具的特征。 我们的记录显示来自Netherlands的101个恶意IP,使其成为全球威胁活动的重要贡献者。 评分65/100需要主动监控和速率限制。建议对敏感系统进行完全封锁。
This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.
Analyzing User-Agent strings reveals automated tools masquerading as legitimate browsers. Inconsistencies between claimed browser capabilities and actual behavior, impossible version combinations, and known scanner signatures help identify malicious clients.
Blocking traffic from specific countries reduces attack surface but impacts legitimate international users. Effective geo-based policies use tiered approaches — blocking, rate limiting, or requiring additional verification based on risk assessment.