
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点,否则你将被曝光
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| UA changed for same IP | 多个User-Agent——机器人轮换技术 | +25 | |
| Danger strong hits: 3 | 高风险路径:Webshell、RCE、漏洞利用 | +75 | |
| Danger medium hits: 1 | 中等风险:管理面板、配置文件 | +10 | |
| Foreign referer seen | 来自无关外部域名的Referer | +10 |
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑,目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
IP 188.119.114.15显示可疑的UA行为。阻止空User-Agent请求。为敏感端点实施基于JavaScript的机器人检测。
来自Shodan的网络侦察数据。开放端口可能表示正在运行的服务、错误配置或潜在的攻击面。
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5432 | PostgreSQL | High | PostgreSQL database — direct database access risk |
| 6000 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6000 |
| 6002 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6002 |
| 6007 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6007 |
| 6021 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6021 |
| 6348 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6348 |
| 6352 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6352 |
| 6363 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6363 |
| 6379 | Redis | Critical | Redis in-memory database — frequently misconfigured without auth |
| 6380 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6380 |
| 6400 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6400 |
| 6405 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6405 |
| 6432 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6432 |
| 6433 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6433 |
| 6443 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6443 |
| 6887 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6887 |
| 6955 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6955 |
| 7000 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7000 |
| 7001 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7001 |
| 7004 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7004 |
| 7010 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7010 |
| 7014 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7014 |
| 7015 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7015 |
| 7016 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7016 |
| 7018 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7018 |
| 7020 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7020 |
| 7022 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7022 |
| 7050 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7050 |
| 7057 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7057 |
| 7071 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7071 |
| 7078 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7078 |
| 7079 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7079 |
| 7080 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7080 |
| 7082 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7082 |
| 7083 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7083 |
| 7085 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7085 |
| 7086 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7086 |
| 7088 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7088 |
| 7090 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7090 |
| 7100 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7100 |
| 7170 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7170 |
| 7171 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7171 |
| 7172 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7172 |
| 7173 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7173 |
| 7218 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7218 |
| 8502 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8502 |
| 9001 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 9001 |
⚠️ 在188.119.114.15上检测到2个高风险端口。开放的数据库端口表明可能存在数据泄露风险。 这些服务在没有严格防火墙规则的情况下不应公开访问。
数据来源:Shodan InternetDB。独立于abuse.mom进行扫描。
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查:Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
188.119.114.15 has been assigned a threat score of 120/100 (Critical). 如此高的分数标志着一个关键威胁行为者。该地址在多个检测向量上表现出持续的、激进的恶意行为。
The following attack categories were identified:
我们的监控基础设施已将188.119.114.15(地理位置为New York, United States,运营在PureVoltage Hosting Inc.的网络中)识别为可疑网络活动的来源。 我们的传感器在15天内捕获了来自此地址的2次恶意请求,反映出每天约0.1次的持续攻击节奏。 该IP被归类为托管/数据中心基础设施,通常与用于自动化攻击活动、僵尸网络命令控制或大规模漏洞扫描的租用服务器相关联。 检测到可疑的User-Agent异常,包括空的、伪造的或快速轮换的UA字符串——自动化扫描工具的特征。 United States目前在我们的数据库中占198个被封锁IP,使其成为恶意流量的重要来源。 威胁评分120/100,此IP属于我们数据库中最危险的地址之一。强烈建议立即完全封锁。
This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.
Examining HTTP headers beyond User-Agent reveals attack tools and automated scripts. Missing standard headers, unusual ordering, non-standard values, and inconsistencies with claimed client identity all serve as reliable detection signals.
Containerized applications face unique security challenges including vulnerable base images, excessive privileges, shared kernel attacks, and insecure orchestration configurations. Runtime security monitoring and immutable container policies mitigate these risks.