
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点,否则你将被曝光
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danger medium hits: 4 | 中等风险:管理面板、配置文件 | +40 | |
| 404 ratio 40-60% | 大多数请求返回404——目录枚举 | +15 | |
| Probe pattern 302->404 same path | 自动分析检测到行为异常 | +20 | |
| Foreign referer seen | 来自无关外部域名的Referer | +10 | |
| Danger medium hits: 8 | 中等风险:管理面板、配置文件 | +60 |
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑,目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
IP 173.44.155.223正在枚举目录。在10次以上404错误后配置fail2ban apache-404 jail。禁用目录列表。
来自同一/24子网的其他被封锁IP——表明该网络范围存在系统性滥用。
来自Shodan的网络侦察数据。开放端口可能表示正在运行的服务、错误配置或潜在的攻击面。
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 80 | HTTP | Low | HTTP web server — standard web traffic |
| 4444 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 4444 |
| 7777 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7777 |
数据来源:Shodan InternetDB。独立于abuse.mom进行扫描。
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查:Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
173.44.155.223 has been assigned a threat score of 105/100 (Critical). 如此高的分数标志着一个关键威胁行为者。该地址在多个检测向量上表现出持续的、激进的恶意行为。
The following attack categories were identified:
IP地址173.44.155.223已追溯至Seattle, United States,运营在Eonix Corporation的网络中。我们的威胁检测系统根据观察到的恶意行为模式标记了此地址。 在其12天的观察窗口期间,我们记录了来自此IP的4次敌对请求——平均每天约0.3次。 该IP从数据中心基础设施运营,是有组织攻击行动中使用的典型地址。 该IP表现出目录枚举行为,系统地请求不存在的路径以发现隐藏文件和配置错误的资源。 我们的记录显示来自United States的133个恶意IP,使其成为全球威胁活动的重要贡献者。 评分105/100将此地址置于最高严重性级别。应封锁并调查任何历史连接。
This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.
Modern attacks increasingly target APIs rather than traditional web interfaces. Attackers enumerate endpoints, test for broken authentication, and exploit excessive data exposure. API attacks are harder to detect as they mimic legitimate programmatic access patterns.
Bulletproof hosting providers deliberately ignore abuse complaints, creating safe havens for malicious operations. These providers often operate in jurisdictions with weak cybercrime enforcement, offering services specifically marketed to criminal organizations.