ABUSE.MOM
威胁报告

IP威胁报告
165.22.240.105

ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点,否则你将被曝光

生成时间: 2026-05-30 11:18:15
首次发现: 2026-04-28 13:00:04
最后发现: 2026-04-29 00:00:11
215

⛔ 判定:封锁

该IP地址已被归类为自动化恶意活动的来源。 威胁评分: 215/100. 已观察到的恶意请求总数: 2.

UA_CHANGEDDANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEREFERERBURST
01

地理位置与分类

IP地址
165.22.240.105
类型
Hosting
国家
🇸🇬 Singapore
城市
Singapore
ISP
DigitalOcean, LLC
组织
DigitalOcean, LLC
自治系统
AS14061 DigitalOcean, LLC
请求次数
2
02

检测签名

签名描述分数严重性
UA changed for same IP多个User-Agent——机器人轮换技术+25
Danger strong hits: 4高风险路径:Webshell、RCE、漏洞利用+100
Danger medium hits: 3中等风险:管理面板、配置文件+30
404 ratio >= 60%大多数请求返回404——目录枚举+25
Probe pattern 302->404 same path自动分析检测到行为异常+20
Foreign referer seen来自无关外部域名的Referer+10
Danger strong hits: 6高风险路径:Webshell、RCE、漏洞利用+100
404 ratio 40-60%大多数请求返回404——目录枚举+15
Burst: 6 req / 2s请求频率异常——自动扫描+35
Σ = 360
03

观察到的活动

从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑,目标域名已隐藏。

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
显示请求: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · 危险模式: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

时间线

2026-04-28 13:00:04
检测到首次恶意请求
IP已从服务器日志进入监控
观察期间
触发了多个检测签名
UA changed for same IP (+25), Danger strong hits: 4 (+100), Danger medium hits: 3 (+30)
2026-04-29 00:00:11
观察到最后一次恶意请求
总分达到: 215/100
下一周期
IP已封锁——所有后续请求被拒绝(HTTP 403)
自动添加到封锁列表
05

网络供应商

DigitalOcean, LLC
AS14061 · 🇸🇬 Singapore
06

建议

已采取和建议的措施

  • IP 165.22.240.105 已在应用层封锁(HTTP 403)
  • 建议在防火墙层(iptables/CSF)进行封锁
  • 通过abuse联系方式向网络供应商举报
  • 确保敏感文件(.env、.git、备份)无法从网络访问

🤖 User-Agent异常防御

IP 165.22.240.105显示可疑的UA行为。阻止空User-Agent请求。为敏感端点实施基于JavaScript的机器人检测。

🔎 目录扫描防御

IP 165.22.240.105正在枚举目录。在10次以上404错误后配置fail2ban apache-404 jail。禁用目录列表。

🌊 洪水/DDoS缓解

在nginx中实施limit_req_zone。部署具有DDoS防护的CDN。配置SYN cookies和连接跟踪以限制165.22.240.105。

08

开放端口和服务

来自Shodan的网络侦察数据。开放端口可能表示正在运行的服务、错误配置或潜在的攻击面。

开放端口 (63)
PortServiceRiskDescription
22SSHLowSecure Shell — common brute force target for remote access
10001UnknownLowService on port 10001
10002UnknownLowService on port 10002
10003UnknownLowService on port 10003
10008UnknownLowService on port 10008
10014UnknownLowService on port 10014
10249UnknownLowService on port 10249
10250UnknownLowService on port 10250
10348UnknownLowService on port 10348
11211UnknownLowService on port 11211
12000UnknownLowService on port 12000
12016UnknownLowService on port 12016
12124UnknownLowService on port 12124
12159UnknownLowService on port 12159
12192UnknownLowService on port 12192
12251UnknownLowService on port 12251
12260UnknownLowService on port 12260
12334UnknownLowService on port 12334
12337UnknownLowService on port 12337
12354UnknownLowService on port 12354
12397UnknownLowService on port 12397
12410UnknownLowService on port 12410
12465UnknownLowService on port 12465
12466UnknownLowService on port 12466
12503UnknownLowService on port 12503
12535UnknownLowService on port 12535
12547UnknownLowService on port 12547
12557UnknownLowService on port 12557
12571UnknownLowService on port 12571
13084UnknownLowService on port 13084
13579UnknownLowService on port 13579
13718UnknownLowService on port 13718
14875UnknownLowService on port 14875
14903UnknownLowService on port 14903
15123UnknownLowService on port 15123
16010UnknownLowService on port 16010
16080UnknownLowService on port 16080
16093UnknownLowService on port 16093
16401UnknownLowService on port 16401
16993UnknownLowService on port 16993
17082UnknownLowService on port 17082
18003UnknownLowService on port 18003
18036UnknownLowService on port 18036
18047UnknownLowService on port 18047
18051UnknownLowService on port 18051
18053UnknownLowService on port 18053
18061UnknownLowService on port 18061
18068UnknownLowService on port 18068
18072UnknownLowService on port 18072
19071UnknownLowService on port 19071
19080UnknownLowService on port 19080
19527UnknownLowService on port 19527
30011UnknownLowService on port 30011
30473UnknownLowService on port 30473
30479UnknownLowService on port 30479
31337UnknownLowService on port 31337
31380UnknownLowService on port 31380
33060UnknownLowService on port 33060
33700UnknownLowService on port 33700
35554UnknownLowService on port 35554
35874UnknownLowService on port 35874
37777UnknownLowService on port 37777
38779UnknownLowService on port 38779
检测到的技术
canonical:ubuntu_linuxopenbsd:openssh:8.9p1
Hostnames: n1.neterzl.shopv1.ldhaojiahuo.shop

数据来源:Shodan InternetDB。独立于abuse.mom进行扫描。

09

黑名单状态 (DNSBL)

该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。

✓ 清洁
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ 清洁
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ 清洁
bl.spamcop.net
✓ 清洁
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ 清洁
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ 清洁
truncate.gbudb.net
✓ 清洁
psbl.surriel.com
✓ 清洁
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net

已检查:Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。

10

Threat Analysis

165.22.240.105 has been assigned a threat score of 215/100 (Critical). 这将其归入严重威胁类别。强烈建议在所有网络边界立即进行封锁。

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent AnomalyPath EnumerationRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

威胁情报分析将165.22.240.105与来自Singapore, Singapore,运营在DigitalOcean, LLC的网络中的恶意活动相关联。该地址自首次检测以来一直处于观察状态。 我们的传感器在1天内捕获了来自此地址的2次恶意请求,反映出每天约2次的持续攻击节奏。 该IP被归类为托管/数据中心基础设施,通常与用于自动化攻击活动、僵尸网络命令控制或大规模漏洞扫描的租用服务器相关联。 3种不同攻击向量的组合表明这是一个复杂的多方位威胁行为者,部署自动化工具同时探测多个攻击面。 我们的记录显示来自Singapore的41个恶意IP,使其成为全球威胁活动的值得注意的贡献者。 威胁评分215/100,此IP属于我们数据库中最危险的地址之一。强烈建议立即完全封锁。

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇸🇬 Top threats from Singapore

129.212.237.216 (308)139.59.123.60 (263)178.128.115.243 (263)178.128.81.197 (263)157.245.196.121 (263)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS14061

129.212.237.216 (308)168.144.34.140 (295)170.64.203.182 (280)161.35.89.38 (273)64.226.94.117 (273)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 User-Agent Analysis Techniques

Analyzing User-Agent strings reveals automated tools masquerading as legitimate browsers. Inconsistencies between claimed browser capabilities and actual behavior, impossible version combinations, and known scanner signatures help identify malicious clients.

💡 Subnet-Level vs IP-Level Blocking

When multiple IPs in a subnet show malicious behavior, subnet blocking efficiently neutralizes the threat. However, overly broad blocking risks impacting legitimate users. Analysis of subnet ownership and historical behavior guides appropriate blocking scope.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: