
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点,否则你将被曝光
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| UA changed for same IP | 多个User-Agent——机器人轮换技术 | +25 | |
| Danger strong hits: 4 | 高风险路径:Webshell、RCE、漏洞利用 | +100 | |
| Danger medium hits: 3 | 中等风险:管理面板、配置文件 | +30 | |
| 404 ratio >= 60% | 大多数请求返回404——目录枚举 | +25 | |
| Probe pattern 302->404 same path | 自动分析检测到行为异常 | +20 | |
| Foreign referer seen | 来自无关外部域名的Referer | +10 | |
| Danger strong hits: 6 | 高风险路径:Webshell、RCE、漏洞利用 | +100 | |
| 404 ratio 40-60% | 大多数请求返回404——目录枚举 | +15 | |
| Burst: 6 req / 2s | 请求频率异常——自动扫描 | +35 |
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑,目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
IP 165.22.240.105显示可疑的UA行为。阻止空User-Agent请求。为敏感端点实施基于JavaScript的机器人检测。
IP 165.22.240.105正在枚举目录。在10次以上404错误后配置fail2ban apache-404 jail。禁用目录列表。
在nginx中实施limit_req_zone。部署具有DDoS防护的CDN。配置SYN cookies和连接跟踪以限制165.22.240.105。
来自Shodan的网络侦察数据。开放端口可能表示正在运行的服务、错误配置或潜在的攻击面。
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | SSH | Low | Secure Shell — common brute force target for remote access |
| 10001 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 10001 |
| 10002 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 10002 |
| 10003 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 10003 |
| 10008 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 10008 |
| 10014 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 10014 |
| 10249 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 10249 |
| 10250 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 10250 |
| 10348 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 10348 |
| 11211 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 11211 |
| 12000 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12000 |
| 12016 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12016 |
| 12124 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12124 |
| 12159 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12159 |
| 12192 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12192 |
| 12251 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12251 |
| 12260 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12260 |
| 12334 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12334 |
| 12337 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12337 |
| 12354 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12354 |
| 12397 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12397 |
| 12410 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12410 |
| 12465 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12465 |
| 12466 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12466 |
| 12503 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12503 |
| 12535 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12535 |
| 12547 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12547 |
| 12557 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12557 |
| 12571 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 12571 |
| 13084 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 13084 |
| 13579 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 13579 |
| 13718 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 13718 |
| 14875 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 14875 |
| 14903 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 14903 |
| 15123 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 15123 |
| 16010 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 16010 |
| 16080 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 16080 |
| 16093 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 16093 |
| 16401 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 16401 |
| 16993 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 16993 |
| 17082 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 17082 |
| 18003 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 18003 |
| 18036 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 18036 |
| 18047 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 18047 |
| 18051 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 18051 |
| 18053 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 18053 |
| 18061 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 18061 |
| 18068 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 18068 |
| 18072 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 18072 |
| 19071 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 19071 |
| 19080 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 19080 |
| 19527 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 19527 |
| 30011 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 30011 |
| 30473 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 30473 |
| 30479 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 30479 |
| 31337 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 31337 |
| 31380 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 31380 |
| 33060 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 33060 |
| 33700 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 33700 |
| 35554 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 35554 |
| 35874 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 35874 |
| 37777 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 37777 |
| 38779 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 38779 |
数据来源:Shodan InternetDB。独立于abuse.mom进行扫描。
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查:Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
165.22.240.105 has been assigned a threat score of 215/100 (Critical). 这将其归入严重威胁类别。强烈建议在所有网络边界立即进行封锁。
The following attack categories were identified:
威胁情报分析将165.22.240.105与来自Singapore, Singapore,运营在DigitalOcean, LLC的网络中的恶意活动相关联。该地址自首次检测以来一直处于观察状态。 我们的传感器在1天内捕获了来自此地址的2次恶意请求,反映出每天约2次的持续攻击节奏。 该IP被归类为托管/数据中心基础设施,通常与用于自动化攻击活动、僵尸网络命令控制或大规模漏洞扫描的租用服务器相关联。 3种不同攻击向量的组合表明这是一个复杂的多方位威胁行为者,部署自动化工具同时探测多个攻击面。 我们的记录显示来自Singapore的41个恶意IP,使其成为全球威胁活动的值得注意的贡献者。 威胁评分215/100,此IP属于我们数据库中最危险的地址之一。强烈建议立即完全封锁。
This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.
Analyzing User-Agent strings reveals automated tools masquerading as legitimate browsers. Inconsistencies between claimed browser capabilities and actual behavior, impossible version combinations, and known scanner signatures help identify malicious clients.
When multiple IPs in a subnet show malicious behavior, subnet blocking efficiently neutralizes the threat. However, overly broad blocking risks impacting legitimate users. Analysis of subnet ownership and historical behavior guides appropriate blocking scope.