IP威胁报告
158.94.211.226
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点，否则你将被曝光
地理位置与分类
检测签名
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| UA suspicious (short/empty) | 自动分析检测到行为异常 | +15 | |
| Danger strong hits: 13 | 高风险路径：Webshell、RCE、漏洞利用 | +100 | |
| Danger medium hits: 7 | 中等风险：管理面板、配置文件 | +60 | |
| Burst: 19 req / 2s | 请求频率异常——自动扫描 | +35 | |
| Burst: 19 req / 10s | 请求频率异常——自动扫描 | +35 | |
| POST requests present | 自动分析检测到行为异常 | +8 |
观察到的活动
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑，目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
时间线
网络供应商
建议
已采取和建议的措施
- IP 158.94.211.226 已在应用层封锁（HTTP 403）
- 建议在防火墙层（iptables/CSF）进行封锁
- 在同一/24子网中检测到其他恶意IP——建议封锁 158.94.211.0/24
- 通过abuse联系方式向网络供应商举报
- 确保敏感文件（.env、.git、备份）无法从网络访问
🤖 User-Agent异常防御
IP 158.94.211.226显示可疑的UA行为。阻止空User-Agent请求。为敏感端点实施基于JavaScript的机器人检测。
🌊 洪水/DDoS缓解
在nginx中实施limit_req_zone。部署具有DDoS防护的CDN。配置SYN cookies和连接跟踪以限制158.94.211.226。
开放端口和服务
来自Shodan的网络侦察数据。开放端口可能表示正在运行的服务、错误配置或潜在的攻击面。
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | FTP | Medium | File Transfer Protocol — often targeted for anonymous login attacks |
| 22 | SSH | Low | Secure Shell — common brute force target for remote access |
| 25 | SMTP | Medium | SMTP mail server — can be abused for spam relay |
| 53 | DNS | Low | DNS server — potential for DNS amplification attacks |
| 80 | HTTP | Low | HTTP web server — standard web traffic |
| 110 | POP3 | Low | Service on port 110 |
| 143 | IMAP | Low | Service on port 143 |
| 443 | HTTPS | Low | HTTPS web server — encrypted web traffic |
| 465 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 465 |
| 587 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 587 |
| 993 | IMAPS | Low | Service on port 993 |
| 995 | POP3S | Low | Service on port 995 |
| 3389 | RDP | High | Remote Desktop Protocol — primary target for ransomware attacks |
| 7001 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7001 |
| 8000 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8000 |
⚠️ 在158.94.211.226上检测到2个高风险端口。暴露的RDP (3389)是勒索软件攻击的首要入口。 这些服务在没有严格防火墙规则的情况下不应公开访问。
| CVE ID | Link |
|---|---|
| CVE-2019-0190 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-26465 | NVD → |
| CVE-2012-3526 | NVD → |
| CVE-2011-2688 | NVD → |
| CVE-2013-0941 | NVD → |
| CVE-2011-1176 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-32728 | NVD → |
| CVE-2007-2768 | NVD → |
| CVE-2013-2765 | NVD → |
| CVE-2008-3844 | NVD → |
| CVE-2013-0942 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-42516 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-49630 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-55753 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-23048 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-58098 | NVD → |
| CVE-2009-3766 | NVD → |
| CVE-2009-0796 | NVD → |
| CVE-2012-4001 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-26466 | NVD → |
| CVE-2009-1390 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-47252 | NVD → |
| CVE-2009-3767 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-43204 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-51767 | NVD → |
🔴 此主机有36个已知CVE与其暴露的服务相关联。如此大量的漏洞强烈表明软件严重过时。 请在NVD数据库中查看每个CVE的详细信息。
数据来源：Shodan InternetDB。独立于abuse.mom进行扫描。
黑名单状态 (DNSBL)
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查：Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
Threat Analysis
158.94.211.226 has been assigned a threat score of 253/100 (Critical). 这是一个严重级别的威胁。系统管理员应将此IP视为敌对地址，无例外地阻止所有入站连接。
The following attack categories were identified:
📊 Threat Analysis
IP地址158.94.211.226已追溯至New York, United States，运营在Omegatech LTD的网络中。我们的威胁检测系统根据观察到的恶意行为模式标记了此地址。 在其1天的观察窗口期间，我们记录了来自此IP的1次敌对请求——平均每天约1次。 该地址被归类为住宅，意味着它可能属于终端用户ISP连接。来自住宅IP的恶意活动通常表明设备已被入侵或属于僵尸网络。 识别出两种攻击模式（User-Agent Anomaly和Request Flooding），表明这是一个针对多个漏洞的半自动化攻击活动。 威胁评分253/100，此IP属于我们数据库中最危险的地址之一。强烈建议立即完全封锁。
This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.
Related Threats
🇺🇸 Top threats from United States
178.16.55.142 (300)91.92.243.240 (175)158.94.211.188 (90)91.92.243.209 (65)View all →Security Intelligence
💡 HTTP Header Analysis for Threat Detection
Examining HTTP headers beyond User-Agent reveals attack tools and automated scripts. Missing standard headers, unusual ordering, non-standard values, and inconsistencies with claimed client identity all serve as reliable detection signals.
💡 DNS-Based Threat Detection
Monitoring DNS queries reveals malicious activity including command-and-control communication, data exfiltration through DNS tunneling, and connections to known malicious domains. DNS is often the first indicator of compromise in network forensics.