
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点,否则你将被曝光
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danger strong hits: 3 | 高风险路径:Webshell、RCE、漏洞利用 | +75 | |
| Danger medium hits: 2 | 中等风险:管理面板、配置文件 | +20 | |
| POST requests present | 自动分析检测到行为异常 | +8 |
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑,目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
将139.5.75.38添加到防火墙封锁列表。检查日志中的成功连接。在所有面向公众的服务上启用全面日志记录。
来自Shodan的网络侦察数据。开放端口可能表示正在运行的服务、错误配置或潜在的攻击面。
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | FTP | Medium | File Transfer Protocol — often targeted for anonymous login attacks |
| 22 | SSH | Low | Secure Shell — common brute force target for remote access |
| 23 | Telnet | Critical | Telnet — unencrypted remote access, extremely dangerous if exposed |
| 80 | HTTP | Low | HTTP web server — standard web traffic |
| 2000 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 2000 |
| 8291 | MikroTik | High | MikroTik Winbox — router management, targeted by VPNFilter malware |
| 8728 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8728 |
⚠️ 在139.5.75.38上检测到3个高风险端口。Telnet (23)以明文传输凭据——可能是被入侵的IoT设备。 这些服务在没有严格防火墙规则的情况下不应公开访问。
数据来源:Shodan InternetDB。独立于abuse.mom进行扫描。
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查:Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
139.5.75.38 has been assigned a threat score of 103/100 (Critical). 凭借此评分,该IP属于严重威胁级别——是我们监控数据库中最危险的地址之一。
威胁情报分析将139.5.75.38与来自Patan, NP,运营在WLINK的网络中的恶意活动相关联。该地址自首次检测以来一直处于观察状态。 在其1天的观察窗口期间,我们记录了来自此IP的1次敌对请求——平均每天约1次。 该地址被归类为住宅,意味着它可能属于终端用户ISP连接。来自住宅IP的恶意活动通常表明设备已被入侵或属于僵尸网络。 NP目前在我们的数据库中占102个被封锁IP,使其成为恶意流量的重要来源。 威胁评分103/100,此IP属于我们数据库中最危险的地址之一。强烈建议立即完全封锁。
This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.
Vulnerability scanning is the automated process of probing web applications for known weaknesses. Attackers use tools like Nuclei, Nikto, and ZAP to test thousands of hosts per hour, looking for exposed configuration files, outdated software, and default credentials.
The vast IPv6 address space makes traditional sequential scanning impractical. However, attackers use DNS records, certificate transparency logs, and predictable address patterns to identify active IPv6 hosts, adapting their techniques to the expanded address space.