
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点,否则你将被曝光
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danger strong hits: 3 | 高风险路径:Webshell、RCE、漏洞利用 | +75 | |
| Danger medium hits: 2 | 中等风险:管理面板、配置文件 | +20 | |
| POST requests present | 自动分析检测到行为异常 | +8 | |
| Danger strong hits: 1 | 高风险路径:Webshell、RCE、漏洞利用 | +25 | |
| Danger medium hits: 1 | 中等风险:管理面板、配置文件 | +10 | |
| 404 ratio >= 60% | 大多数请求返回404——目录枚举 | +25 |
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑,目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
IP 118.91.191.161正在枚举目录。在10次以上404错误后配置fail2ban apache-404 jail。禁用目录列表。
来自Shodan的网络侦察数据。开放端口可能表示正在运行的服务、错误配置或潜在的攻击面。
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 53 | DNS | Low | DNS server — potential for DNS amplification attacks |
| 80 | HTTP | Low | HTTP web server — standard web traffic |
数据来源:Shodan InternetDB。独立于abuse.mom进行扫描。
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查:Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
118.91.191.161 has been assigned a threat score of 103/100 (Critical). 如此高的分数标志着一个关键威胁行为者。该地址在多个检测向量上表现出持续的、激进的恶意行为。
The following attack categories were identified:
威胁情报分析将118.91.191.161与来自Murshidābād, India,运营在WORLDPHONE的网络中的恶意活动相关联。该地址自首次检测以来一直处于观察状态。 我们的传感器在2天内捕获了来自此地址的2次恶意请求,反映出每天约1次的持续攻击节奏。 从住宅网络运营,此IP可能代表一个被入侵的家庭网关或已被招募到更大攻击基础设施中的IoT设备。 该IP表现出目录枚举行为,系统地请求不存在的路径以发现隐藏文件和配置错误的资源。 India目前在我们的数据库中占105个被封锁IP,使其成为恶意流量的重要来源。 威胁评分103/100,此IP属于我们数据库中最危险的地址之一。强烈建议立即完全封锁。
This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.
Credential stuffing uses stolen username-password pairs from data breaches to attempt logins across many websites. Since users frequently reuse passwords, these automated attacks achieve success rates of 0.1-2%, which translates to thousands of compromised accounts from millions of attempts.
When multiple IPs in a subnet show malicious behavior, subnet blocking efficiently neutralizes the threat. However, overly broad blocking risks impacting legitimate users. Analysis of subnet ownership and historical behavior guides appropriate blocking scope.