
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点,否则你将被曝光
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burst: 11 req / 2s | 请求频率异常——自动扫描 | +35 | |
| Burst: 11 req / 10s | 请求频率异常——自动扫描 | +35 | |
| Foreign referer seen | 来自无关外部域名的Referer | +10 |
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑,目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
在nginx中实施limit_req_zone。部署具有DDoS防护的CDN。配置SYN cookies和连接跟踪以限制116.202.218.61。
来自Shodan的网络侦察数据。开放端口可能表示正在运行的服务、错误配置或潜在的攻击面。
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | SMTP | Medium | SMTP mail server — can be abused for spam relay |
| 80 | HTTP | Low | HTTP web server — standard web traffic |
| 443 | HTTPS | Low | HTTPS web server — encrypted web traffic |
| CVE ID | Link |
|---|---|
| CVE-2024-47252 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-38473 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-43204 | NVD → |
| CVE-2012-3526 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-53020 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-58098 | NVD → |
| CVE-2013-0942 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-65082 | NVD → |
| CVE-2013-2765 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-42516 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-27316 | NVD → |
| CVE-2009-2299 | NVD → |
| CVE-2011-2688 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-23048 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-38709 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-66200 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-59775 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-38476 | NVD → |
| CVE-2012-4360 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-38474 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-38475 | NVD → |
| CVE-2007-4723 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-36387 | NVD → |
| CVE-2012-4001 | NVD → |
| CVE-2009-0796 | NVD → |
🔴 此主机有37个已知CVE与其暴露的服务相关联。如此大量的漏洞强烈表明软件严重过时。 请在NVD数据库中查看每个CVE的详细信息。
数据来源:Shodan InternetDB。独立于abuse.mom进行扫描。
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查:Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
116.202.218.61 has been assigned a threat score of 80/100 (Critical). 这将其归入严重威胁类别。强烈建议在所有网络边界立即进行封锁。
The following attack categories were identified:
IP地址116.202.218.61已追溯至Falkenstein, Germany,运营在Hetzner Online GmbH的网络中。我们的威胁检测系统根据观察到的恶意行为模式标记了此地址。 在其1天的观察窗口期间,我们记录了来自此IP的1次敌对请求——平均每天约1次。 被归类为托管IP,此地址可能运行在租用的服务器或云实例上。攻击者偏好数据中心IP因其高带宽和一次性特点。 来自此IP的基于速率的攻击旨在通过大量请求洪水压垮服务器资源。 Germany目前在我们的数据库中占163个被封锁IP,使其成为恶意流量的重要来源。 评分80/100表明这是一个已确认的恶意行为者。网络级别封锁是适当的。
This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.
Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.
Expired, self-signed, or misconfigured TLS certificates create security vulnerabilities and trust issues. Certificate monitoring, automated renewal through ACME protocols, and proper certificate chain configuration prevent both security gaps and service disruptions.