
ABUSE.MOM — 规矩点,否则你将被曝光
| 签名 | 描述 | 分数 | 严重性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| UA bot: python | 检测到已知机器人/爬虫的User-Agent | +40 | |
| Danger medium hits: 1 | 中等风险:管理面板、配置文件 | +10 | |
| Imported from old blocklist | 自动分析检测到行为异常 | +0 |
从服务器访问日志重建的HTTP请求。出于安全考虑,目标域名已隐藏。
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
IP 107.189.25.71显示可疑的UA行为。阻止空User-Agent请求。为敏感端点实施基于JavaScript的机器人检测。
来自Shodan的网络侦察数据。开放端口可能表示正在运行的服务、错误配置或潜在的攻击面。
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | FTP | Medium | File Transfer Protocol — often targeted for anonymous login attacks |
| 53 | DNS | Low | DNS server — potential for DNS amplification attacks |
| 80 | HTTP | Low | HTTP web server — standard web traffic |
| 443 | HTTPS | Low | HTTPS web server — encrypted web traffic |
| 587 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 587 |
| 993 | IMAPS | Low | Service on port 993 |
| 3306 | MySQL | High | MySQL database — should never be exposed to the internet |
⚠️ 在107.189.25.71上检测到2个高风险端口。 这些服务在没有严格防火墙规则的情况下不应公开访问。
| CVE ID | Link |
|---|---|
| CVE-2023-42114 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-42115 | NVD → |
| CVE-2022-3559 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-42116 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-51766 | NVD → |
| CVE-2022-37451 | NVD → |
| CVE-2022-3620 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-42117 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-39929 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-42119 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-67896 | NVD → |
🔴 此主机有11个已知CVE与其暴露的服务相关联。如此大量的漏洞强烈表明软件严重过时。 请在NVD数据库中查看每个CVE的详细信息。
数据来源:Shodan InternetDB。独立于abuse.mom进行扫描。
该IP已通过全球邮件服务器和防火墙使用的主要DNS黑名单进行检查。
已检查:Spamhaus、SpamCop、Barracuda、SORBS、CBL、UCEProtect。
107.189.25.71 has been assigned a threat score of 50/100 (Medium). 该地址具有中等风险评级。建议进行防御性监控,如果活动加剧则升级为封锁。
The following attack categories were identified:
威胁情报分析将107.189.25.71与来自Zaandam, Netherlands,运营在RouterHosting LLC的网络中的恶意活动相关联。该地址自首次检测以来一直处于观察状态。 该地址在我们的监控系统中活跃了1天,产生了3次标记请求,速率约为每天3次。 此地址属于数据中心或云托管提供商。托管IP经常被专门租用廉价VPS实例来进行攻击的威胁行为者利用。 检测到可疑的User-Agent异常,包括空的、伪造的或快速轮换的UA字符串——自动化扫描工具的特征。 Netherlands目前在我们的数据库中占107个被封锁IP,使其成为恶意流量的重要来源。 评分50/100需要主动监控和速率限制。建议对敏感系统进行完全封锁。
This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.
Examining HTTP headers beyond User-Agent reveals attack tools and automated scripts. Missing standard headers, unusual ordering, non-standard values, and inconsistencies with claimed client identity all serve as reliable detection signals.
Containerized applications face unique security challenges including vulnerable base images, excessive privileges, shared kernel attacks, and insecure orchestration configurations. Runtime security monitoring and immutable container policies mitigate these risks.