ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
96.126.106.95

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-09-08 17:48:30
First seen: 2026-08-08 21:51:49
Last seen: 2026-08-09 04:09:09
60

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 60/100. Total malicious requests observed: 18.

BURSTRATIO_404
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
96.126.106.95
Type
Hosting
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Cedar Knolls
ISP
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
Organization
Linode
Autonomous System
AS63949 Akamai Connected Cloud
Hit Count
18
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
404 ratio >= 60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+25
Burst 5/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Σ = 60
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-08-08 21:51:49
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
404 ratio >= 60% (+25), Burst 5/2s (+35)
2026-08-09 04:09:09
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 60/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Akamai Technologies, Inc.
AS63949 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 96.126.106.95 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Directory Scan Defense

IP 96.126.106.95 is enumerating directories. Configure fail2ban apache-404 jail after 10+ 404 errors. Disable directory listings. Normalize all 404 responses.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 96.126.106.95.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

96.126.106.95 has been assigned a threat score of 60/100 (High). This score indicates high threat severity. The IP has shown clear patterns of malicious behavior that warrant immediate defensive measures.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path EnumerationRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

Threat intelligence analysis has linked 96.126.106.95 to malicious activity originating from Cedar Knolls, United States, operating on the network of Akamai Technologies, Inc.. The address has been under observation since its initial detection. Over a period of 1 days, this IP generated 18 malicious requests, averaging approximately 18 requests per day. The IP is classified as hosting/datacenter infrastructure, commonly associated with rented servers used for automated attack campaigns, botnet command-and-control, or vulnerability scanning at scale. Two attack patterns were identified (Path Enumeration and Request Flooding), suggesting a semi-automated campaign that targets multiple vulnerabilities. United States currently accounts for 195 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. At 60/100, this IP presents a meaningful threat. Implement rate limiting with escalation to blocking.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

104.28.246.115 (350)104.28.214.122 (350)216.73.160.52 (350)34.187.158.4 (340)34.186.187.208 (340)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS63949

104.64.217.139 (265)172.235.133.193 (240)97.107.128.157 (240)173.255.253.10 (240)172.232.164.94 (240)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 IoT Device Compromise Patterns

Internet of Things devices are prime targets for botnet recruitment due to weak default credentials, infrequent updates, and always-on connectivity. Compromised IoT devices generate persistent scanning and attack traffic without their owners knowledge.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: