ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
95.81.103.22

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-09-06 01:54:36
First seen: 2026-08-24 23:18:37
Last seen: 2026-08-30 01:03:51
70

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 70/100. Total malicious requests observed: 160.

BURSTREFERERUA_CHANGED
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
95.81.103.22
Type
Hosting
Country
🇳🇱 Netherlands
City
Amsterdam
ISP
Clodo Cloud Service CO. L.L.C
Organization
Unknown
Autonomous System
AS216154 CLODO CLOUD SERVICE CO. L.L.C
Hit Count
160
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Burst 10/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Foreign refererReferer from unrelated external domain+10
UA changedMultiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique+25
Σ = 70
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-08-24 23:18:37
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Burst 10/10s (+35), Foreign referer (+10), UA changed (+25)
2026-08-30 01:03:51
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 70/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Clodo Cloud Service CO. L.L.C
AS216154 · 🇳🇱 Netherlands
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 95.81.103.22 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🌊 Traffic Flood Defense

IP 95.81.103.22 is generating excessive traffic. Limit connections per source IP. Enable geographic blocking if traffic from this region is unexpected.

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 95.81.103.22 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

95.81.103.22 has been assigned a threat score of 70/100 (High). This score indicates high threat severity. The IP has shown clear patterns of malicious behavior that warrant immediate defensive measures.

The following attack categories were identified:

Request FloodingUser-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

Network traffic from 95.81.103.22, located in Amsterdam, Netherlands, operating on the network of Clodo Cloud Service CO. L.L.C, has been classified as malicious by our automated threat scoring engine. Over a period of 5 days, this IP generated 160 malicious requests, averaging approximately 32 requests per day. The IP is classified as hosting/datacenter infrastructure, commonly associated with rented servers used for automated attack campaigns, botnet command-and-control, or vulnerability scanning at scale. Two attack patterns were identified (Request Flooding and User-Agent Anomaly), suggesting a semi-automated campaign that targets multiple vulnerabilities. Netherlands currently accounts for 103 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. At 70/100, this IP warrants immediate defensive action.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇳🇱 Top threats from Netherlands

91.92.43.144 (358)91.92.43.186 (358)91.92.43.190 (358)91.92.43.157 (358)91.92.43.153 (358)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS216154

95.81.99.54 (85)103.90.73.179 (80)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 Watering Hole Attack Strategy

Watering hole attacks compromise websites frequently visited by target organizations. Rather than attacking targets directly, adversaries infect trusted resources, exploiting the inherent trust users place in regularly visited sites.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: