ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
95.25.162.25

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-27 14:51:02
First seen: 2026-02-22 03:00:07
Last seen: 2026-02-22 03:00:07
60

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 60/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

UA_CHANGEDBURST
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
95.25.162.25
Type
Mobile
Country
🇷🇺 Russia
City
Krasnodar
ISP
PJSC "Vimpelcom"
Organization
Beeline Broadband
Autonomous System
AS3216 PJSC "Vimpelcom"
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
UA changed for same IPMultiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique+25
Burst: 6 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Σ = 60
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-02-22 03:00:07
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
UA changed for same IP (+25), Burst: 6 req / 2s (+35)
2026-02-22 03:00:07
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 60/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

PJSC "Vimpelcom"
AS3216 · 🇷🇺 Russia
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 95.25.162.25 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 95.25.162.25 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 95.25.162.25.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

95.25.162.25 has been assigned a threat score of 60/100 (High). This classifies it as a high-severity threat. Proactive blocking is recommended for sensitive infrastructure.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent AnomalyRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

IP address 95.25.162.25 has been traced to Krasnodar, Russia, operating on the network of PJSC "Vimpelcom". Our threat detection systems have flagged this address based on observed malicious behavior patterns. During its 1-day observation window, we recorded 1 hostile requests from this IP — roughly 1 per day on average. This is a mobile network IP. While mobile addresses are typically shared via CGNAT, persistent malicious activity from this specific address suggests automated abuse. Two attack patterns were identified (User-Agent Anomaly and Request Flooding), suggesting a semi-automated campaign that targets multiple vulnerabilities. Our records show 106 malicious IPs originating from Russia, positioning it as a significant contributor to global threat activity. At 60/100, this IP presents a meaningful threat. Implement rate limiting with escalation to blocking.

11

Related Threats

🇷🇺 Top threats from Russia

157.22.102.172 (313)178.130.54.159 (288)72.56.191.6 (265)95.182.125.201 (265)91.240.87.225 (263)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS3216

81.222.98.3 (128)81.222.98.25 (118)81.9.28.25 (108)81.222.98.20 (90)81.222.98.27 (80)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 HTTP Header Analysis for Threat Detection

Examining HTTP headers beyond User-Agent reveals attack tools and automated scripts. Missing standard headers, unusual ordering, non-standard values, and inconsistencies with claimed client identity all serve as reliable detection signals.

💡 Digital Forensics Fundamentals

Digital forensics preserves and analyzes electronic evidence following attacks. Proper chain of custody, forensic imaging, timeline reconstruction, and artifact analysis are essential for understanding attack scope, attribution, and preventing recurrence.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: