ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
95.154.200.52

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-27 12:25:04
First seen: 2026-05-02 04:00:06
Last seen: 2026-05-02 04:00:06
155

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 155/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

UA_CHANGEDDANGER_PATHBURSTREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
95.154.200.52
Type
Hosting
Country
🇬🇧 United Kingdom
City
Maidenhead
ISP
Iomart Hosting Ltd
Organization
CreeperHost
Autonomous System
AS20860 IOMART CLOUD SERVICES LIMITED
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
UA changed for same IPMultiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique+25
Danger strong hits: 2High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+50
Burst: 63 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 76 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 155
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-05-02 04:00:06
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
UA changed for same IP (+25), Danger strong hits: 2 (+50), Burst: 63 req / 2s (+35)
2026-05-02 04:00:06
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 155/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Iomart Hosting Ltd
AS20860 · 🇬🇧 United Kingdom
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 95.154.200.52 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 95.154.200.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 Bot Detection

Address UA spoofing from 95.154.200.52: maintain blocklist of known malicious UA strings, require consistent UA across sessions, implement TLS fingerprinting.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 95.154.200.52.

07

Neighbors in 95.154.200.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

95.154.200.52 has been assigned a threat score of 155/100 (Critical). This is a critical-level threat. Systems administrators should treat this IP as hostile and block all inbound connections without exception.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent AnomalyRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

IP address 95.154.200.52 has been traced to Maidenhead, United Kingdom, operating on the network of Iomart Hosting Ltd. Our threat detection systems have flagged this address based on observed malicious behavior patterns. During its 1-day observation window, we recorded 1 hostile requests from this IP — roughly 1 per day on average. Classified as a hosting IP, this address likely runs on a rented server or cloud instance. Attackers prefer datacenter IPs for their high bandwidth and disposable nature. The dual attack vectors of User-Agent Anomaly combined with Request Flooding indicate a coordinated assault rather than opportunistic scanning. United Kingdom currently accounts for 106 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. A score of 155/100 places this address in the top tier of severity. Block and investigate any historical connections.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇬🇧 Top threats from United Kingdom

104.28.208.60 (340)104.28.240.60 (340)91.230.225.3 (305)45.86.203.224 (305)45.86.203.35 (305)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS20860

162.220.245.159 (175)95.154.200.36 (155)109.169.10.3 (155)217.194.215.46 (105)95.154.200.56 (105)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 HTTP Header Analysis for Threat Detection

Examining HTTP headers beyond User-Agent reveals attack tools and automated scripts. Missing standard headers, unusual ordering, non-standard values, and inconsistencies with claimed client identity all serve as reliable detection signals.

💡 Multi-Factor Authentication Importance

MFA dramatically reduces the effectiveness of credential-based attacks. Even when passwords are compromised through phishing or data breaches, the additional authentication factor prevents unauthorized access in the vast majority of cases.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: