ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
94.243.18.210

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-09-14 14:48:41
First seen: 2026-08-19 14:00:40
Last seen: 2026-08-23 02:06:26
80

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 80/100. Total malicious requests observed: 173.

BURSTREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
94.243.18.210
Type
Mobile
Country
🇷🇺 Russia
City
Vladivostok
ISP
MKS75 Network
Organization
Unknown
Autonomous System
AS8359 MTS PJSC
Hit Count
173
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Burst 14/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 8/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Foreign refererReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 80
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-08-19 14:00:40
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Burst 14/10s (+35), Burst 8/2s (+35), Foreign referer (+10)
2026-08-23 02:06:26
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 80/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

MKS75 Network
AS8359 · 🇷🇺 Russia
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 94.243.18.210 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 94.243.18.210.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

94.243.18.210 has been assigned a threat score of 80/100 (Critical). With this rating, the IP falls into the critical severity bracket — among the most dangerous addresses in our monitoring database.

The following attack categories were identified:

Request Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

Threat intelligence analysis has linked 94.243.18.210 to malicious activity originating from Vladivostok, Russia, operating on the network of MKS75 Network. The address has been under observation since its initial detection. Over a period of 3 days, this IP generated 173 malicious requests, averaging approximately 57.7 requests per day. This is a mobile network IP. While mobile addresses are typically shared via CGNAT, persistent malicious activity from this specific address suggests automated abuse. Rate-based attacks from this IP aim to overwhelm server resources through high-volume request flooding. Russia currently accounts for 119 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. A threat score of 80/100 places this IP in the high-risk category. Blocking at the firewall level is recommended.

11

Related Threats

🇷🇺 Top threats from Russia

157.22.102.172 (313)178.130.54.159 (288)213.183.54.30 (275)185.103.167.63 (265)72.56.191.6 (265)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS8359

91.78.121.215 (105)94.243.11.84 (80)94.243.8.74 (80)94.243.14.200 (80)94.243.11.178 (80)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 SSH Brute Force Defense

SSH servers face constant brute force attacks targeting common usernames and weak passwords. Key-based authentication, fail2ban, non-standard ports, and IP allowlisting dramatically reduce the attack surface. Monitoring auth logs reveals active campaigns and compromised credentials.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: