ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
94.132.98.110

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-27 12:44:30
First seen: 2026-02-24 14:00:05
Last seen: 2026-02-24 14:00:05
103

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 103/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

DANGER_PATHMETHOD
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
94.132.98.110
Type
Residential
Country
🇵🇹 Portugal
City
Porto
ISP
NOS Comunicacoes S.A.
Organization
TVCABO-Portugal
Autonomous System
AS2860 NOS COMUNICACOES, S.A.
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger strong hits: 3High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+75
Danger medium hits: 2Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+20
POST requests presentBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+8
Σ = 103
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-02-24 14:00:05
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger strong hits: 3 (+75), Danger medium hits: 2 (+20), POST requests present (+8)
2026-02-24 14:00:05
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 103/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

NOS Comunicacoes S.A.
AS2860 · 🇵🇹 Portugal
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 94.132.98.110 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

⚙️ Defensive Recommendations

Block 94.132.98.110 at the network perimeter. Implement defense-in-depth combining IP blocking with application-layer protections.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

94.132.98.110 has been assigned a threat score of 103/100 (Critical). This is a critical-level threat. Systems administrators should treat this IP as hostile and block all inbound connections without exception.

📊 Threat Analysis

IP address 94.132.98.110 has been traced to Porto, Portugal, operating on the network of NOS Comunicacoes S.A.. Our threat detection systems have flagged this address based on observed malicious behavior patterns. The address has been active for 1 days in our monitoring system, producing 1 flagged requests at a rate of ~1/day. The address is classified as residential, meaning it likely belongs to an end-user ISP connection. Malicious activity from residential IPs typically indicates device compromise or botnet membership. With 57 flagged addresses, Portugal represents a notable presence in our threat database. At 103/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇵🇹 Top threats from Portugal

85.234.64.161 (170)5.157.20.73 (140)5.157.20.26 (140)5.157.20.57 (140)89.114.245.185 (140)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS2860

89.153.241.155 (103)95.92.247.25 (103)95.95.173.34 (103)95.92.153.98 (103)109.49.21.184 (80)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 Credential Stuffing at Scale

Credential stuffing uses stolen username-password pairs from data breaches to attempt logins across many websites. Since users frequently reuse passwords, these automated attacks achieve success rates of 0.1-2%, which translates to thousands of compromised accounts from millions of attempts.

💡 Security Header Best Practices

HTTP security headers provide defense-in-depth with minimal implementation effort. Key headers include Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy, each addressing specific attack vectors.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: