ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
92.71.73.101

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-30 07:37:03
First seen: 2026-02-17 17:25:06
Last seen: 2026-02-17 17:26:16
65

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 65/100. Total malicious requests observed: 3.

BOT_UADANGER_PATHRATIO_404IMPORT
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
92.71.73.101
Type
Residential
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Ashburn
ISP
LT-CODE200GTT
Organization
Unknown
Autonomous System
AS22773 Cox Communications Inc.
Hit Count
3
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
UA bot: curlKnown bot/crawler User-Agent detected+40
Danger medium hits: 1Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+10
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Imported from old blocklistBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+0
Σ = 65
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-02-17 17:25:06
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
UA bot: curl (+40), Danger medium hits: 1 (+10), 404 ratio 40-60% (+15)
2026-02-17 17:26:16
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 65/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

LT-CODE200GTT
AS22773 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 92.71.73.101 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 92.71.73.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 Bot Detection

Address UA spoofing from 92.71.73.101: maintain blocklist of known malicious UA strings, require consistent UA across sessions, implement TLS fingerprinting.

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 92.71.73.101: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

07

Neighbors in 92.71.73.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

92.71.73.101 has been assigned a threat score of 65/100 (High). The IP is rated as a high-level threat. Network administrators should implement blocking rules and monitor for any connections from this address.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent AnomalyPath Enumeration

📊 Threat Analysis

IP address 92.71.73.101 has been traced to Ashburn, United States, operating on the network of LT-CODE200GTT. Our threat detection systems have flagged this address based on observed malicious behavior patterns. The address has been active for 1 days in our monitoring system, producing 3 flagged requests at a rate of ~3/day. This residential IP is likely a compromised consumer device. Home routers and IoT equipment with default credentials are prime targets for botnet operators. The dual attack vectors of User-Agent Anomaly combined with Path Enumeration indicate a coordinated assault rather than opportunistic scanning. With 173 flagged addresses, United States represents a significant presence in our threat database. At 65/100, this IP presents a meaningful threat. Implement rate limiting with escalation to blocking.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

104.28.246.115 (350)104.28.246.113 (340)104.28.246.116 (340)104.28.235.58 (340)104.28.246.122 (340)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS22773

72.207.109.5 (180)98.172.107.12 (155)70.174.106.157 (140)68.96.252.29 (135)174.77.223.154 (130)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 User-Agent Analysis Techniques

Analyzing User-Agent strings reveals automated tools masquerading as legitimate browsers. Inconsistencies between claimed browser capabilities and actual behavior, impossible version combinations, and known scanner signatures help identify malicious clients.

💡 Email Authentication: SPF, DKIM, DMARC

Email authentication protocols work together to prevent spoofing. SPF validates sending servers, DKIM provides cryptographic message signing, and DMARC defines enforcement policies. Full implementation significantly reduces phishing effectiveness.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: