ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
91.217.249.55

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-27 10:49:28
First seen: 2026-05-11 00:00:06
Last seen: 2026-05-11 00:00:06
75

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 75/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

BOT_UADANGER_PATH
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
91.217.249.55
Type
VPN/Proxy
Country
🇩🇪 Germany
City
Frankfurt am Main
ISP
F.N.S. HOLDINGS LIMITED
Organization
VPN Consumer Frankfurt, Germany
Autonomous System
AS206092 F.N.S. HOLDINGS LIMITED
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
UA bot: pythonKnown bot/crawler User-Agent detected+40
Danger strong hits: 1High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+25
Danger medium hits: 1Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+10
Σ = 75
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-05-11 00:00:06
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
UA bot: python (+40), Danger strong hits: 1 (+25), Danger medium hits: 1 (+10)
2026-05-11 00:00:06
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 75/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

F.N.S. HOLDINGS LIMITED
AS206092 · 🇩🇪 Germany
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 91.217.249.55 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 91.217.249.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 91.217.249.55 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

07

Neighbors in 91.217.249.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

91.217.249.55 has been assigned a threat score of 75/100 (High). At this threat level, the IP is considered high risk. Firewall rules should be updated to deny traffic from this source.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

Threat intelligence analysis has linked 91.217.249.55 to malicious activity originating from Frankfurt am Main, Germany, operating on the network of F.N.S. HOLDINGS LIMITED. The address has been under observation since its initial detection. Over a period of 1 days, this IP generated 1 malicious requests, averaging approximately 1 requests per day. The address operates as a VPN/proxy exit node. Attackers route traffic through anonymizing services to obscure their real location and evade IP-based security controls. Detected suspicious User-Agent anomalies including empty, forged, or rapidly rotating UA strings — characteristic of automated scanning tools. Germany currently accounts for 139 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. A threat score of 75/100 places this IP in the high-risk category. Blocking at the firewall level is recommended.

This IP is associated with a VPN or proxy service. Attackers frequently route their traffic through anonymizing services to obscure their true location. This makes attribution more challenging but the malicious behavior patterns remain detectable.

11

Related Threats

🇩🇪 Top threats from Germany

15.220.152.241 (320)77.81.65.244 (313)185.168.29.98 (313)91.217.249.222 (305)212.30.36.219 (305)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS206092

103.163.220.216 (340)85.203.21.101 (320)85.203.21.157 (310)85.203.21.172 (305)91.217.249.222 (305)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 User-Agent Analysis Techniques

Analyzing User-Agent strings reveals automated tools masquerading as legitimate browsers. Inconsistencies between claimed browser capabilities and actual behavior, impossible version combinations, and known scanner signatures help identify malicious clients.

💡 GeoIP Blocking Considerations

Blocking traffic from specific countries reduces attack surface but impacts legitimate international users. Effective geo-based policies use tiered approaches — blocking, rate limiting, or requiring additional verification based on risk assessment.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: