ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
91.122.56.59

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-30 06:21:45
First seen: 2026-02-20 18:35:04
Last seen: 2026-02-20 18:35:04
235

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 235/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

BOT_UADANGER_PATHRATIO_404BURSTREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
91.122.56.59
Type
Residential
Country
🇷🇺 Russia
City
St Petersburg
ISP
OJSC "North-West Telecom"
Organization
JSC North-West Telecom
Autonomous System
AS12389 PJSC Rostelecom
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
UA bot: Go-http-clientKnown bot/crawler User-Agent detected+40
Danger strong hits: 10High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Burst: 10 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 10 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 235
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-02-20 18:35:04
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
UA bot: Go-http-client (+40), Danger strong hits: 10 (+100), 404 ratio 40-60% (+15)
2026-02-20 18:35:04
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 235/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

OJSC "North-West Telecom"
AS12389 · 🇷🇺 Russia
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 91.122.56.59 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 91.122.56.59 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

🔎 Directory Scan Defense

IP 91.122.56.59 is enumerating directories. Configure fail2ban apache-404 jail after 10+ 404 errors. Disable directory listings. Normalize all 404 responses.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 91.122.56.59.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (4)
PortServiceRiskDescription
443HTTPSLowHTTPS web server — encrypted web traffic
2222UnknownLowService on port 2222
5432PostgreSQLHighPostgreSQL database — direct database access risk
6379RedisCriticalRedis in-memory database — frequently misconfigured without auth

⚠️ 2 high-risk ports detected on 91.122.56.59. Open database ports suggest possible data exfiltration risk. These services should not be publicly accessible without strict firewall rules.

DETECTED TECHNOLOGIES
redislabs:rediscanonical:ubuntu_linuxpostgresql:postgresqlgoogle:web_serveropenbsd:openssh:9.6p1

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

91.122.56.59 has been assigned a threat score of 235/100 (Critical). This places it in the critical threat category. Immediate blocking is strongly advised across all network perimeters.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent AnomalyPath EnumerationRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

Threat intelligence analysis has linked 91.122.56.59 to malicious activity originating from St Petersburg, Russia, operating on the network of OJSC "North-West Telecom". The address has been under observation since its initial detection. During its 1-day observation window, we recorded 1 hostile requests from this IP — roughly 1 per day on average. Operating from a residential network, this IP may represent a compromised home gateway or IoT device that has been drafted into a larger attack infrastructure. The diversity of 3 separate attack methods suggests a comprehensive attack toolkit — likely an automated scanner that tests for vulnerabilities across multiple categories. Our records show 111 malicious IPs originating from Russia, positioning it as a significant contributor to global threat activity. A score of 235/100 places this address in the top tier of severity. Block and investigate any historical connections.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇷🇺 Top threats from Russia

157.22.102.172 (313)178.130.54.159 (288)72.56.191.6 (265)95.182.125.201 (265)91.240.87.225 (263)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS12389

178.34.163.28 (173)87.225.37.4 (165)95.70.102.6 (165)87.225.66.136 (165)92.37.143.236 (165)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 HTTP Header Analysis for Threat Detection

Examining HTTP headers beyond User-Agent reveals attack tools and automated scripts. Missing standard headers, unusual ordering, non-standard values, and inconsistencies with claimed client identity all serve as reliable detection signals.

💡 Responsible Disclosure Ethics

Responsible disclosure balances public safety with giving vendors time to patch vulnerabilities. The security community generally supports coordinated disclosure timelines, but disagreements about appropriate timeframes and full disclosure continue to drive policy debates.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: