ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
88.204.41.21

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-27 19:29:16
First seen: 2026-03-12 20:00:07
Last seen: 2026-03-16 16:00:05
65

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 65/100. Total malicious requests observed: 3.

BOT_UADANGER_PATH
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
88.204.41.21
Type
Residential
Country
🇧🇦 BA
City
Sarajevo
ISP
Ivanov Vitaliy Sergeevich
Organization
Yury Dolin
Autonomous System
AS48031 Ivanov Vitaliy Sergeevich
Hit Count
3
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
UA bot: axiosKnown bot/crawler User-Agent detected+40
Danger strong hits: 1High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+25
Σ = 65
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-03-12 20:00:07
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
UA bot: axios (+40), Danger strong hits: 1 (+25)
2026-03-16 16:00:05
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 65/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Ivanov Vitaliy Sergeevich
AS48031 · 🇧🇦 BA
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 88.204.41.21 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 88.204.41.21 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

88.204.41.21 has been assigned a threat score of 65/100 (High). This score indicates high threat severity. The IP has shown clear patterns of malicious behavior that warrant immediate defensive measures.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

Network traffic from 88.204.41.21, located in Sarajevo, BA, operating on the network of Ivanov Vitaliy Sergeevich, has been classified as malicious by our automated threat scoring engine. Over a period of 3 days, this IP generated 3 malicious requests, averaging approximately 1 requests per day. This is a residential IP address, suggesting a compromised home device such as a router, smart appliance, or infected workstation participating in a botnet. Detected suspicious User-Agent anomalies including empty, forged, or rapidly rotating UA strings — characteristic of automated scanning tools. Our records show 27 malicious IPs originating from BA, positioning it as a notable contributor to global threat activity. At 65/100, this IP presents a meaningful threat. Implement rate limiting with escalation to blocking.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇧🇦 Top threats from BA

98.159.36.23 (140)46.255.27.20 (103)188.127.125.102 (103)109.175.105.199 (103)77.78.224.29 (103)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS48031

View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 User-Agent Analysis Techniques

Analyzing User-Agent strings reveals automated tools masquerading as legitimate browsers. Inconsistencies between claimed browser capabilities and actual behavior, impossible version combinations, and known scanner signatures help identify malicious clients.

💡 Responsible Disclosure Ethics

Responsible disclosure balances public safety with giving vendors time to patch vulnerabilities. The security community generally supports coordinated disclosure timelines, but disagreements about appropriate timeframes and full disclosure continue to drive policy debates.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: