ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
88.130.49.76

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-27 12:48:55
First seen: 2026-02-25 19:25:02
Last seen: 2026-02-25 19:25:02
70

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 70/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

FORM_SPAM
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
88.130.49.76
Type
Residential
Country
🇩🇪 Germany
City
Münster
ISP
1&1 Versatel GmbH
Organization
Versatel Deutschland
Autonomous System
AS8881 1&1 Versatel GmbH
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Form spam: no_js_checkSpam/malware keywords in request content+0
Σ = 0
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-02-25 19:25:02
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Form spam: no_js_check
2026-02-25 19:25:02
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 70/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

1&1 Versatel GmbH
AS8881 · 🇩🇪 Germany
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 88.130.49.76 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

📧 Spam Protection

Enable CAPTCHA on all public forms. Add honeypot fields. Rate-limit submissions to 3 per minute per IP. Deploy Akismet or CleanTalk.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

88.130.49.76 has been assigned a threat score of 70/100 (High). This classifies it as a high-severity threat. Proactive blocking is recommended for sensitive infrastructure.

📊 Threat Analysis

Threat intelligence analysis has linked 88.130.49.76 to malicious activity originating from Münster, Germany, operating on the network of 1&1 Versatel GmbH. The address has been under observation since its initial detection. Our sensors captured 1 malicious requests from this address across a 1-day span, reflecting a sustained attack cadence of ~1 requests per day. Operating from a residential network, this IP may represent a compromised home gateway or IoT device that has been drafted into a larger attack infrastructure. With 129 flagged addresses, Germany represents a significant presence in our threat database. A threat score of 70/100 places this IP in the high-risk category. Blocking at the firewall level is recommended.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇩🇪 Top threats from Germany

15.220.152.241 (320)77.81.65.244 (313)185.168.29.98 (313)91.217.249.222 (305)212.30.36.219 (305)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS8881

45.39.130.141 (268)104.253.140.120 (245)82.23.88.142 (140)83.135.11.205 (130)166.0.50.137 (105)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 SQL Injection Campaigns

SQL injection remains one of the most common web attack vectors. Attackers inject malicious SQL code through input fields to extract database contents, modify data, or gain administrative access. Automated scanners test for SQLi vulnerabilities at massive scale.

💡 Responsible Disclosure Ethics

Responsible disclosure balances public safety with giving vendors time to patch vulnerabilities. The security community generally supports coordinated disclosure timelines, but disagreements about appropriate timeframes and full disclosure continue to drive policy debates.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: