ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
85.8.130.25

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-29 14:19:03
First seen: 2026-05-27 21:51:25
Last seen: 2026-05-29 12:53:18
100

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 100/100. Total malicious requests observed: 51.

DANGER_PATHRATIO_404UA_CHANGED
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
85.8.130.25
Type
Unknown
Country
🇤🇤 ??
City
Unknown
ISP
Unknown
Organization
Unknown
Autonomous System
Unknown
Hit Count
51
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Danger medium hits: 1Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+10
Danger strong hits: 2High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+50
UA changedMultiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique+25
Σ = 100
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-05-27 21:51:25
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
404 ratio 40-60% (+15), Danger medium hits: 1 (+10), Danger strong hits: 2 (+50)
2026-05-29 12:53:18
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 100/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 85.8.130.25 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 85.8.130.0/24
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 85.8.130.25: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 85.8.130.25 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

07

Neighbors in 85.8.130.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

85.8.130.25 has been assigned a threat score of 100/100 (Critical). With this rating, the IP falls into the critical severity bracket — among the most dangerous addresses in our monitoring database.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path EnumerationUser-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

Network traffic from 85.8.130.25, located in an unknown location, has been classified as malicious by our automated threat scoring engine. The address has been active for 1 days in our monitoring system, producing 51 flagged requests at a rate of ~51/day. The dual attack vectors of Path Enumeration combined with User-Agent Anomaly indicate a coordinated assault rather than opportunistic scanning. At 100/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.

11

Related Threats

🇤🇤 Top threats from ??

View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 Brute Force Attack Mechanics

Brute force attacks systematically try username and password combinations to gain unauthorized access. Modern attacks leverage credential databases from previous breaches, testing millions of combinations using distributed botnets across multiple IP addresses.

💡 SQL Injection Campaigns

SQL injection remains one of the most common web attack vectors. Attackers inject malicious SQL code through input fields to extract database contents, modify data, or gain administrative access. Automated scanners test for SQLi vulnerabilities at massive scale.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: