ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
84.175.188.196

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-27 12:52:44
First seen: 2026-02-25 14:53:06
Last seen: 2026-02-25 14:53:06
70

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 70/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

FORM_SPAM
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
84.175.188.196
Type
Residential
Country
🇩🇪 Germany
City
Bischofswiesen
ISP
Deutsche Telekom AG
Organization
Deutsche Telekom AG
Autonomous System
AS3320 Deutsche Telekom AG
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Form spam: no_js_checkSpam/malware keywords in request content+0
Σ = 0
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-02-25 14:53:06
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Form spam: no_js_check
2026-02-25 14:53:06
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 70/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Deutsche Telekom AG
AS3320 · 🇩🇪 Germany
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 84.175.188.196 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

📧 Content Abuse Prevention

IP 84.175.188.196 is flooding forms with spam. Implement time-based tokens and block IPs submitting more than 5 forms per hour.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

84.175.188.196 has been assigned a threat score of 70/100 (High). The IP is rated as a high-level threat. Network administrators should implement blocking rules and monitor for any connections from this address.

📊 Threat Analysis

IP address 84.175.188.196 has been traced to Bischofswiesen, Germany, operating on the network of Deutsche Telekom AG. Our threat detection systems have flagged this address based on observed malicious behavior patterns. Over a period of 1 days, this IP generated 1 malicious requests, averaging approximately 1 requests per day. This residential IP is likely a compromised consumer device. Home routers and IoT equipment with default credentials are prime targets for botnet operators. With 159 flagged addresses, Germany represents a significant presence in our threat database. The score of 70/100 indicates a confirmed malicious actor. Network-level blocking is appropriate.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇩🇪 Top threats from Germany

15.220.152.241 (320)77.81.65.244 (313)185.168.29.98 (313)91.217.249.222 (305)212.30.36.219 (305)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS3320

87.181.64.183 (145)209.166.16.14 (140)93.216.74.62 (140)87.159.207.2 (103)217.255.121.3 (103)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 SQL Injection Campaigns

SQL injection remains one of the most common web attack vectors. Attackers inject malicious SQL code through input fields to extract database contents, modify data, or gain administrative access. Automated scanners test for SQLi vulnerabilities at massive scale.

💡 GeoIP Blocking Considerations

Blocking traffic from specific countries reduces attack surface but impacts legitimate international users. Effective geo-based policies use tiered approaches — blocking, rate limiting, or requiring additional verification based on risk assessment.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: